Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNotice of Motion dated 27th October 2020 (Kajiado Chief Magistrate's Court ELC Case No. 04 of 2020 referred to)· [2021] KEELC 2413 (KLR)

James Muraguri Kabono v Equity Bank (K) Limited [2021] KEELC 2413 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court of Kenya
27 July 2021
1,242 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court ruled you cannot transfer a case that a magistrate's court already dismissed for lack of jurisdiction—file fresh instead.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Applicant, through Advocate Margaret Kimani, filed a Notice of Motion dated 27th October 2020 under section 18(1) of the Civil Procedure Act seeking transfer of Kajiado Chief Magistrate's Court ELC Case No. 04 of 2020 to the Environment and Land Court at Kajiado. The Applicant explained that the magistrate's court had pronounced itself without jurisdiction and that no orders had been issued to preserve the suit property, which was to be auctioned on 14th October 2020. The Respondent opposed through a Notice of Preliminary Objection dated 28th January 2021, contending that the court lacked power under section 18 to transfer a suit from a court without jurisdiction, since such a suit remains a nullity. The sole issue framed was whether the lower court case could be transferred to the ELC. Relying on Owners of Motor Vessel 'Lillian S' v Caltex Oil (jurisdiction is everything) and David Kabungu v Zikarenga (the applicant must make out a strong case, and want of jurisdiction in the court from which transfer is sought is no ground for transfer), the court held that since the magistrate had already downed her tools for want of jurisdiction, there was no suit capable of being transferred. The Applicant had also failed to make out a strong case beyond citing the absence of interim orders. The application was found unmerited and dismissed with costs to the Respondent, in a virtual delivery at Kajiado on 27th July 2021 by Christine Ochieng, Judge.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the High Court (ELC) can transfer a suit pending in a subordinate court where the magistrate has already declined jurisdiction

Holding

The court cannot; once the magistrate downed tools for want of jurisdiction there is no suit pending to transfer, and want of jurisdiction in the transferring court is itself no ground for transfer

Reasoning

Section 18(1) of the Civil Procedure Act empowers the High Court to withdraw suits pending in subordinate courts. However, applying Lillian S and Kabungu, jurisdiction is everything and a transfer presupposes an existing proceeding. Where the magistrate had already held she lacked jurisdiction and downed her tools, there is no live suit to withdraw or transfer. Further, want of jurisdiction of the court from which transfer is sought is expressly no ground for ordering transfer; the applicant also failed to make out a strong case.

p. 2
02

Whether the applicant made out a strong case for transfer

Holding

No. The applicant merely lamented the absence of interim orders preserving the suit property from an intended auction

Reasoning

Citing Kabungu, the burden lies on the applicant to make out a strong case for transfer; a mere balance of convenience is insufficient. The applicant only indicated that no interim orders were granted in the lower court and did not demonstrate expense, inconvenience, hardship or interests of justice justifying transfer. In any event, since the lower court had declined jurisdiction, nothing remained to transfer.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A court without jurisdiction cannot make any order; it must down its tools once it finds it lacks jurisdiction
  • The burden lies on an applicant seeking transfer of a suit to make out a strong case; want of jurisdiction of the court from which transfer is sought is no ground for ordering transfer
  • Where the subordinate court has downed its tools for want of jurisdiction, there is no pending suit capable of transfer under section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Notice of Motion application dated 27th October 2020 is dismissed with costs to the Respondent

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure ActSection 18(1) and 18(2)

Cases cited (7)

  • Aberdare Investments V Bernard Wachira & 5 Others
    (2014) eKLR
  • Wycliffe Mwangaza Kihugwa V Grainbulk Handlers Limited
    (2014) eKLR
  • Grace Thogori Komo V Dan Njagi Ndwiga
    (2013) eKLR
  • Abraham Mwangi Wamigwi Vs Simon Mbiri Wanjiku & Another
    (2012) eKLR
  • Charles Omwata Omwoyo Vs African Highlands & Produce Co. Ltd
    Misc Application No. 308 of 2002 (2002) eKLR
  • The Owners of Motor Vessel "Lillian S" vs. Caltex Oil Kenya Limited
    (1989) KLR 1
  • David Kabungu Vs Zikarenga
    HCCC NO. 36 OF 1995
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 18(1) of the Civil Procedure Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "James Muraguri Kabono v Equity Bank (K) Limited [2021] KEELC 2413 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Notice of Motion dated 27th October 2020 (Kajiado Chief Magistrate's Court ELC Case No. 04 of 2020 referred to). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2021/2413/eng@2021-07-27

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.