Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedELC (Kerugoya) Notice of Motion dated 10th September 2020· [2021] KEELC 2093 (KLR)

Edith Muthoni Muchiri & another v Cecilia Wamuyu Nyaga & 5 others; Susan Wanjira Nyaga (Applicant) [2021] KEELC 2093 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
23 July 2021
4,931 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~20 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court froze land transfers for 60 days, ruling that a deceased co-owner's share must pass through succession, not be deleted by consent.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The applicant, Susan Wanjira Nyaga, widow of the late Nyaga Gachoki Chii, moved the Environment and Land Court at Kerugoya by Notice of Motion dated 10th September 2020 seeking leave for Magee Law LLP to come on record, an inhibition over seven resultant parcels carved out of Ngariama/Kabare/391, and leave to appeal out of time against a ruling of Hon. E.O. Wambo delivered on 31st December 2019 in Kerugoya ELC No. 15 of 2015, which dismissed her application for review of a consent order recorded on 16th August 2018. The respondents, the deceased's daughters, opposed, maintaining the 1993 registration was a joint tenancy carrying jus accrescendi, that the consent order generously reserved ½ acre for the applicant, and that the application was defective and the delay in appealing unexplained. The court held that where co-owners are registered with defined shares (1/5 each), the ownership is a tenancy in common, not a joint tenancy; consequently the deceased's share could only devolve through succession, and the deletion of his name from the register by consent was unlawful and illegal. On that basis the court found the notice of motion merited. It allowed the firm of Magee Law LLP to act for the applicant, issued an inhibition over parcels Ngariama/Kabare/1902, 1903, 2081, 2082, 1905, 1906 and 1907 limited to 60 days pending filing of the intended appeal, and ordered the respondents to bear the costs. The court did not expressly rule on the prayer for extension of time to appeal.

Key legal issues

#
01

Nature of co-ownership where shares are defined

Holding

Registration with defined shares creates a tenancy in common, so deletion of the deceased's name without succession was unlawful

Reasoning

The court reasoned that under Section 91 of the Land Registration Act read with the statutory provision on co-ownership, where an instrument and registration show defined shares (1/5 each), the co-ownership is a tenancy in common. On the death of a co-owner, the share must devolve through succession, not by survivorship. The consent order deleting Nyaga Gachoki Chii's name bypassed succession and was therefore illegal.

p. 7
02

Inhibition pending intended appeal

Holding

An inhibition was warranted to protect the estate and the applicant's interest because parcels were being transferred and the ½ acre reserved was at risk

Reasoning

The court found that the resultant parcels were registered to various third parties and transfers were ongoing, and that the ½ acre meant for the applicant no longer existed in its intended form. An inhibition would prevent the appeal being rendered nugatory, though it was limited to 60 days pending filing of the appeal.

p. 7

Legal principles established

#
  • Where persons are registered with defined shares, the ownership is a tenancy in common and a deceased co-owner's share can only pass through succession proceedings

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The firm of MAGEE LAW LLP is authorized to appear for the interested party/Applicant
  2. 2.An order of inhibition is issued inhibiting any further dealings and/or transactions relating to Land Parcel No. NGARIAMA/KABARE/1902, 1903, 2081, 2082, 1905, 1906 and 1907 for a period of 60 days pending filing of the intended Appeal
  3. 3.The costs of the application to be borne by the Respondents

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Land Registration ActSection 91(2) and (3)
  • Registered Land Act Cap 300 (repealed)Section 102(1)
  • Law of Succession ActSection 36(1)(b)
  • Land Registration ActSection 68
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 79G
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 50 Rule 6; Order 9 Rules 5, 9 and 10

Cases cited (4)

  • Re Estate of John Ngumba Njoroge (deceased)
    (2018) eKLR
  • Joseph Njoroge v Reuben Waweru Mberia
    (2017) eKLR
  • Isabel Chelangat v Samuel Tirop Rotich & 5 others
    (2012) eKLR
  • Mukaziton Josphine v Attorney General Republic of Kenya
    (2015) eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Inherent jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court; Land Registration Act and Civil Procedure Act provisions cited by parties

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Edith Muthoni Muchiri & another v Cecilia Wamuyu Nyaga & 5 others; Susan Wanjira Nyaga (Applicant) [2021] KEELC 2093 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). ELC (Kerugoya) Notice of Motion dated 10th September 2020. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2021/2093/eng@2021-07-23

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.