Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedELC. Miscellaneous Application No. 2 of 2020 - JR· [2021] KEELC 1788 (KLR)

Asili Housing Cooperative Society Ltd v District Land Registrar, Kajiado South and Central (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application 2 of 2020) [2021] KEELC 1788 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court at Kajiado
30 September 2021
2,489 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~10 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's land registries cannot refuse to open Green Cards for titles they issued—the Kajiado court ordered the Registrar to do so for 49 parcels.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Environment and Land Court at Kajiado determined an undefended judicial review application by Asili Housing Cooperative Society Ltd under Order 53 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules against the District Land Registrar, Kajiado South and Central. The applicant, registered owner of the mother title KJD/KAPUTIEI NORTH/26142, had subdivided the parcel and obtained titles in the names of its members, but the Registrar declined to open Green Cards for the resultant parcels, preventing official searches. Members sued the applicant to complete the process, and the applicant's advocates' demand letter of 3rd July 2020 went unanswered. The Respondent, though served on 26th January 2021 and again with a mention notice, filed no appearance or replying affidavit, and the court treated the uncontroverted averments as an admission. Relying on section 7 of the Land Registration Act, the Fair Administrative Action Act, Articles 40, 47 and 73(1) of the Constitution, and the mandamus principles in Republic v Kenya National Examinations Council ex parte Gathenji, the court held that the Registrar had abdicated a statutory administrative duty to maintain the registry and furnish Green Cards, contravening the constitutional right to fair administrative action, natural justice and the right to property. The court allowed the application, quashed the Registrar's decision and issued mandamus compelling the opening of Green Cards for all forty-nine listed parcels. No costs order appears in the judgment.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Land Registrar had a statutory and administrative duty to open Green Cards for titles he had issued, and whether his refusal was amenable to judicial review

Holding

The Registrar had an administrative role under the Land Registration Act, the Fair Administrative Action Act and Article 47 of the Constitution to maintain the registry and avail Green Cards; his unexplained refusal abdicated that duty and was unlawful.

Reasoning

Section 7(1) and (2) of the Land Registration Act requires a land registry to be maintained in each registration unit and obliges the Registrar to make information in the land registry accessible to any person on payment of the prescribed fee. Having issued titles to the applicant's members, the Registrar was bound to maintain supporting records (Green Cards). He gave no reason for refusing to open them despite receiving all relevant documents including the mother title, mutation forms and area list. That failure contravened the Land Registration Act, the Fair Administrative Action Act and Article 47.

p. 3
02

Whether an undefended judicial review application founded on the Registrar's failure to respond should be granted

Holding

As the Respondent was duly served but neither entered appearance nor filed a replying affidavit, the averments went uncontroverted and amounted to an admission, entitling the applicant to the orders sought.

Reasoning

The Respondent was served with the application on 26th January 2021 and again with a mention notice, yet filed no appearance or response. The court treated the failure to controvert as an admission of the applicant's averments. On the uncontroverted material, including annexed titles and a demand letter from the applicant's advocates, the court found the failure to furnish Green Cards violated natural justice and the constitutional right to property, and that the applicant had met the threshold for mandamus.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • An order of mandamus compels the performance of a public duty imposed on a person or body by statute where that person or body has failed to perform the duty to the detriment of a party with a legal right to expect its performance
  • Every person has a right to administrative action which is expeditious, efficient, lawful, reasonable and procedurally fair, with reasons given, under Article 47 of the Constitution

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The decision of the Land Registrar, Kajiado South and Central for declining to open Green Cards for the listed parcels of land (KJD/KAPUTIEI NORTH/59209 through 59219) be and is hereby quashed
  2. 2.An Order of Mandamus do issue compelling the Respondent to open Green Cards of ALL the Titles issued by him to the Applicant, to wit for the listed parcels of land KJD/KAPUTIEI NORTH/59209 through 59219

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 53 Rule 1
  • Land Registration ActSection 7(1) and (2)
  • Fair Administrative Action Actgenerally
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 47 (and Articles 40, 47(2), 73(1))

Cases cited (9)

  • Suchan Investment Limited V Ministry of National Heritage & Culture & 3 Others
  • R V Chairman Business Premises Rent Tribunal & 2 others Ex parte Nakuru Stores Co. Ltd
    (2016) eKLR
  • Republic V The County Secretary, County Government of Kirinyaga & Another
    (2020) eKLR
  • Apotex Inc V Canada (Attorney General)
    (193) Can L11 3004 (FCA)
  • Kingdom Kenya 01 Limited versus the District Land Registrar, Narok & Fifteen (15) others
    [2018] eKLR
  • Commissioner of Lands versus Hotel Kunste
    [1997] eKLR
  • David Mugo t/a Manyatta Auctioneers versus Republic - Civil Appeal No. 265 of 1997 (UR)
  • Zakayo Michubu Kibwange versus Lydia Kagina Japheth and 2 others
    [2014] eKLR
  • Republic vs. Kenya National Examinations Council ex parte Gathenji & 8 Others
    Civil Appeal No 234 of 1996
Jurisdiction invoked
Order 53 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules; Articles 40, 47(2) and 73(1) of the Constitution

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Later judgments citing this (1)

#

Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Asili Housing Cooperative Society Ltd v District Land Registrar, Kajiado South and Central (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application 2 of 2020) [2021] KEELC 1788 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). ELC. Miscellaneous Application No. 2 of 2020 - JR. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2021/1788/eng@2021-09-30

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.