Tabu Lazaro Nzuya & another v David Kinisu Sifuna & 9 others [2021] KEELC 1771 (KLR)
The bottom line
#Kenya's Environment and Land Court struck out a land suit because it cannot overturn the High Court's orders, and the two courts have equal status.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether the ELC has jurisdiction to set aside consent orders of the High Court
It does not; the ELC is a court of equal, autonomous jurisdiction and cannot review, supervise or sit on appeal over High Court decisions.
Article 162(2)(b) created the ELC with jurisdiction over environment and land disputes. The Supreme Court in Republic v Karisa Chengo established that the ELC, ELRC and High Court are different, autonomous courts of equal hierarchical stature; none can superintend or review the decisions of another. Because prayers (a) and (c) sought to set aside consent orders of the High Court, and that jurisdiction taint persisted across the plaint, the court lacked jurisdiction over the whole suit and struck it out.
Whether the suit against the deceased 9th defendant was a nullity
The objection raised that a suit filed nearly eight years after the 9th defendant's death was a nullity, but the court's jurisdictional finding disposed of the entire suit before this ground fell for decision.
The 9th defendant died on 3rd June 2012 and the plaint was filed on 25th March 2019, with a death certificate, grant and confirmed grant exhibited. Counsel for the plaintiffs argued the defect was curable by substitution. However, having found it lacked jurisdiction, the court could not proceed to determine the remaining issues, as any decision made would amount to nothing.
Whether the plaintiffs had locus standi
Not determined on the merits; the objection was overtaken by the jurisdictional finding disposing of the whole suit.
The 1st defendant argued the plaintiffs lacked locus because the deceased neither owned the suit property nor was the agency created by power of attorney transmissible by death. The plaintiffs asserted capacity as legal representatives holding letters of administration. The court did not pronounce on locus standi, as jurisdiction was decisive and the suit was struck out in its entirety.
Legal principles established
#- Jurisdiction must be determined as soon as it is raised and a court without jurisdiction must down tools immediately.
- The ELC and ELRC are autonomous courts of equal status with the High Court and cannot hear matters reserved to the High Court's jurisdiction, including review of High Court decisions.
- A suit filed against a deceased person is a nullity from inception (as submitted and relied on by the 9th defendant).
Court orders
#- 1.The 1st defendant's Notice of Preliminary Objection dated 25th November 2019 is allowed.
- 2.The plaint dated 25th March 2019 is struck out.
- 3.The suit is dismissed with costs to the defendants.
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution of Kenya
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Tabu Lazaro Nzuya & another v David Kinisu Sifuna & 9 others [2021] KEELC 1771 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). ELC Suit (Mombasa), plaint dated 25th March 2019. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2021/1771/eng@2021-07-21
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.