Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedNot stated in judgment· [2021] KEELC 1508 (KLR)

Hawa Mohamed Abdalla (suing as the administrator of the estate of Mohamed Hussein Absura (Deceased) v United Care Limited & 2 others [2021] KEELC 1508 (KLR)

High Court of Kenya
15 October 2021
1,995 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~8 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The High Court confirmed that a late, unpermitted challenge to taxed legal fees fails, and the advocate could enforce Kshs. 7,094,870.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This Ruling of the High Court at Machakos (O. A. Angote, J) determined two competing applications arising from taxation of an advocate-client bill of costs. By his application dated 16th October 2020, the Advocate sought judgment against the Client for Kshs. 7,094,870 as taxed by the Taxing Officer, together with transfer of the suit property Nairobi/Block 60/485 held by the Advocate as lien for his fees. By chamber summons dated 30th December 2020, the Client sought to set aside the Taxing Officer's Ruling, contending that the wrong schedule was applied, items were allowed as drawn, and VAT was erroneously computed at 16% instead of the pandemic-era rate of 14%. The Advocate opposed, arguing the reference was filed out of time and without leave, was an abuse of process, and disclosed no grounds for interfering with the Taxing Master's discretion. The court first considered timeliness under Clause 11 of the Advocates Remuneration Order, which allows 14 days to object and a further 14 days to file a reference upon receipt of reasons. Since the Ruling of 10th September 2020 constituted the reasons, the Client should have filed by 24th September 2020 or sought leave. The reference filed on 30th December 2020 without leave was therefore struck out. Applying In re Estate of Alice Kahaki Njoka [2016] eKLR, the court held that filing a reference does not grant an automatic stay of execution on a valid certificate of costs. The Advocate's application was allowed as prayed; the Client's application was struck out with costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Timeliness of a reference against a taxing officer's decision

Holding

The Client was required to file the reference within 14 days of delivery of the Ruling (10th September 2020), i.e. by 24th September 2020, or seek leave; having done neither, the reference was fatally out of time.

Reasoning

Clause 11 of the Advocates Remuneration Order requires notice of objection within 14 days and a chamber summons reference within 14 days of receipt of reasons. The Ruling of 10th September 2020 constituted the reasons; the Client annexed it to his own application, showing no other reasons existed. Filing on 30th December 2020 without leave breached Clause 11.

p. 3
02

Effect of filing a reference on entry of judgment on a certificate of taxation

Holding

Filing a reference or requesting reasons does not stay execution or defeat judgment on a valid certificate of costs.

Reasoning

Relying on In re Estate of Alice Kahaki Njoka [2016] eKLR, the court held that a certificate of costs under Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act is valid and binding until set aside or altered, so execution premised on it is lawful. The mere filing of a reference cannot defeat the application for entry of judgment.

p. 3
03

Merits of the Advocate's application for judgment on the taxed costs

Holding

The application dated 16th October 2020 was meritorious since the reference stalling it was struck out.

Reasoning

The court framed the two applications as interdependent: judgment on the taxed sum could only be denied if the Client's reference succeeded. With the reference struck out for being out of time and without leave, no grounds remained to interfere with the Taxing Master's certificate for Kshs. 7,094,870.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • A reference to challenge a taxing officer's decision must be filed within 14 days or with leave of the court; filing a reference does not stay execution on a certificate of taxation.
  • A certificate of costs remains valid and binding until set aside or altered by the court, and execution on it is lawful.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Application dated 16th October, 2020 is allowed as prayed
  2. 2.The Application dated 30th December, 2020 is struck out with costs
Jurisdiction invoked
Advocates Remuneration Order, Clause 11

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Hawa Mohamed Abdalla (suing as the administrator of the estate of Mohamed Hussein Absura (Deceased) v United Care Limited & 2 others [2021] KEELC 1508 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2021/1508/eng@2021-10-15

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.