Barnabas Asembo Okech v Nairobi City County & 2 others [2021] KEELC 1274 (KLR)
The bottom line
#What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether the plaintiff met the threshold for a temporary injunction
The application failed; the plaintiff did not establish a prima facie case, having adduced no evidence of how he acquired the suit property beyond a certificate of title and allotment letter, and the application had been overtaken by events
The court applied the Giella v Cassman Brown principles and the definition of a prima facie case in Mrao Ltd v First American Bank. Relying on Kenleb Cons. Ltd v New Gatitu Services, it held the applicant must fully disclose relevant facts and demonstrate a right requiring protection. The plaintiff's word stood against the 1st defendant's denial of allocation, and the house had already been demolished on 11th June 2021, mooting part of the relief.
Legal principles established
#- In an application for injunction the onus is on the applicant to satisfy the court that the injunction should be granted, on the Giella v Cassman Brown principles
- An applicant for an injunction must make full disclosure of all relevant facts and show a right, legal or equitable, requiring protection
Court orders
#- 1.The Notice of Motion dated 10th March 2021 is dismissed
- 2.Costs to abide the outcome of the main suit
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Sections 1A, 1B and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act (Cap 21) and Orders 40 and 51 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Barnabas Asembo Okech v Nairobi City County & 2 others [2021] KEELC 1274 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Not stated in the judgment as provided. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2021/1274/eng@2021-10-21
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.