Stanley Kipkurui Cheruiyot & 29 others v District Land Adjudication & Settlement Officer, Transmara East/ West Districts & 2 others; Kitatei Ntingidai Ole Sipei & 8 others (Interested Parties) [2021] KEELC 1179 (KLR)
The bottom line
#The court struck out 29 farmers' land ownership petition because they had to first exhaust land adjudication dispute procedures before going to court.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court over land in an ongoing adjudication section
The court lacked jurisdiction because section 30 of the Land Adjudication Act bars civil proceedings concerning interests in land in an adjudication section until the register becomes final, and the adjudication register here had not been closed
The parcels in dispute fall within Olonkolin Adjudication Section and the adjudication process remained unfinished - indeed interim orders barred the Respondents from closing the register. Section 30 of Cap 284, which is mandatory, prohibits instituting or entertaining civil proceedings on interests in land in such a section absent the adjudication officer's written consent. The Petitioners, seeking declarations of ownership, did not comply with this procedure.
Exhaustion of statutory remedies under the Land Adjudication Act
The Petitioners were obliged to use the dispute resolution mechanisms in sections 26, 29 and 30 of Cap 284, including appeal to the Minister, before approaching the court
Relying on Abdallah Mangi Mohamed and Mutanga Tea & Coffee Company Ltd, the court held that where a statute prescribes a specific dispute resolution mechanism, it must be utilised first. Article 159(2)(c) recognises alternative dispute resolution, and the mechanisms in the Land Adjudication Act had not been declared unconstitutional. Entertaining the petition would usurp those mechanisms.
Res judicata in respect of the mandamus prayer
Prayer No. 2 (mandamus to re-open the register) was res judicata, having been determined in Kisii HCJR Misc. App No. 36 of 2011, even though the Petitioners were not parties to that suit
Section 7 of the Civil Procedure Act embodies res judicata to end litigation and prevent abuse of process. Although the Petitioners were not parties to the earlier Kisii suit, the issues and subject matter were similar and directly in issue, and the earlier matter was heard and determined by a court of competent jurisdiction. Section 28 of the Environment Court Act also bars re-litigation of finally determined issues.
Legal principles established
#- Where a statute prescribes a specific dispute resolution mechanism, an aggrieved party must exhaust that mechanism before invoking the High Court's inherent jurisdiction
- No court shall entertain civil proceedings concerning an interest in land in an adjudication section until the adjudication register has become final under section 29(3) of the Land Adjudication Act, save with the adjudication officer's written consent
Court orders
#- 1.The Petition dated 22.02.2013 is struck out with costs to the Respondent and the Interested Parties
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Articles 22, 23, 35 and 40 of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010 and Articles 6 and 7 of the Sixth Schedule
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Stanley Kipkurui Cheruiyot & 29 others v District Land Adjudication & Settlement Officer, Transmara East/ West Districts & 2 others; Kitatei Ntingidai Ole Sipei & 8 others (Interested Parties) [2021] KEELC 1179 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Constitutional Petition No. 536 of 2017 (Petition dated 22nd February 2013). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2021/1179/eng@2021-10-27
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.