Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCOtherNot stated in judgment· [2021] KEELC 1173 (KLR)

Elizabeth Wanjira Evans (suing as Administrators of the Estate of Rahab Wanjiru Evans, [Deceased] & 2 others v National Land Commission & another [2021] KEELC 1173 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
28 October 2021
3,206 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~13 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court threw out an attempt to withdraw a land petition because two of four estate administrators acted without the others.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling of the Environment and Land Court, Milimani, by Oguttu Mboya J, dealt with a dispute over representation and an attempted withdrawal of a petition concerning L.R. No. 209/11540 (Grant IR 56017/1), filed in 2018 by Elizabeth Wanjira Evans as administrator of the estate of Rahab Wanjiru Evans. The matter was to be disposed of by written submissions, but before determination, the firm of Gitonga Muthii & Co. Advocates filed a Notice of Appointment claiming appointment by 'the estate' and a Notice of Withdrawal of Petition dated 30th July 2021, supported by an authority signed by two administrators. S.M. Omae & Co. Advocates objected that the incoming firm was improperly on record, while the 2nd Respondent opposed withdrawal on public policy grounds and sought leave to file a cross-petition. The court framed two issues: whether Gitonga Muthii & Co. was properly on record, and whether the withdrawal notice was valid. Holding that an estate is not a legal person capable of instructing counsel, and that under Order 9 Rule 7 of the Civil Procedure Rules a notice of appointment requires prior action in person, the court found the firm not lawfully on record. On the second issue, relying on Sections 81 and 82 of the Law of Succession Act, it held that four joint administrators possess one indivisible capacity, so two could not authorise withdrawal without the others. The Notice of Appointment and Notice of Withdrawal were both expunged, the petition was declared alive for determination on the filed submissions, and costs of the preliminary proceedings were ordered to abide the course. The court affirmed, citing the Supreme Court in Salat v IEBC, that a party's right of withdrawal cannot be barred, subject only to costs - but that right presupposes valid authority and representation.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether M/S Gitonga Muthii & Co. Advocates were properly on record for the estate of the deceased

Holding

Not properly on record; the Notice of Appointment was incompetent and expunged.

Reasoning

The Notice of Appointment stated the firm was appointed by 'the estate of Rahab Wanjiru Evans'. The court held an estate is not a legal person able to instruct counsel; only duly appointed administrators may do so. No particulars of the appointing persons were disclosed, nor had the 'estate' previously acted in person as required by Order 9 Rule 7 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010, rendering the notice invalid.

p. 3
02

Whether the Notice of Withdrawal of Petition dated 30th July 2021 was legitimate and valid

Holding

Invalid and a nullity; expunged from the record and the Petition remains alive.

Reasoning

The grant of letters of administration was issued jointly to four persons, conferring a singular, indivisible capacity. Only two administrators (and one apparently misnamed) signed the authority to withdraw, without the involvement of the other co-administrators. Section 81 of the Law of Succession Act permits survivors to act alone only upon the death of other administrators, which was not shown.

p. 5
03

Whether a party may be blocked from withdrawing its own petition

Holding

No; withdrawal is a right subject only to costs, but the present withdrawal was无效 because the authority and representation were defective.

Reasoning

Relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Nicholas Kiptoo Arap Korir Salat v IEBC & 7 others, the court affirmed that a party cannot be denied the right to withdraw its matter, and an aggrieved party's remedy lies in costs. However, this right presupposes a duly instructed counsel and valid authority, which were absent here.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • A deceased's estate is not a legal person capable of appointing counsel; only duly appointed administrators may engage an advocate for the estate.
  • Co-administrators under a joint grant possess one indivisible capacity and none may act for the estate unilaterally while others live.
  • A party's right to withdraw its own matter cannot be barred by a court; the only recourse for an aggrieved party is an order as to costs.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The law firm of M/s Gitonga Muthii & Co. Advocates are not lawfully on record for the Petitioners or at all.
  2. 2.The Notice of Appointment of Advocate dated 30th July 2021, filed by the firm of M/S Gitonga Muthii & Co. Advocates is contrary to the provisions of Order 9 Rule 7 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010.
  3. 3.The said Notice of Appointment of Advocate be and is hereby expunged from the record.
  4. 4.The Notice of Withdrawal dated 30th July 2021, be and is hereby expunged from the Record.
  5. 5.The Petition herein remains alive and existent and same ought to be determined on the basis of the written submissions that were duly filed and form part of the record, until same is lawfully and/or Legally Withdrawn.
  6. 6.Costs of the Preliminary proceedings shall abide the course.

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Law of Succession Act, Chapter 160, Laws of KenyaSection 82
  • Law of Succession Act, Chapter 160, Laws of KenyaSection 81
  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010Order 9 Rule 7

Cases cited (2)

  • Nicholas Kiptoo Arap Korir Salat vs Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & 7 others
    [2014] eKLR
  • John O. Ochanda vs Telkom Kenya Limited, Motion No. 25 of 2014
Jurisdiction invoked
Original constitutional petition jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court (not expressly cited in the judgment)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Elizabeth Wanjira Evans (suing as Administrators of the Estate of Rahab Wanjiru Evans, [Deceased] & 2 others v National Land Commission & another [2021] KEELC 1173 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2021/1173/eng@2021-10-28

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.