Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNot stated in judgment (notice of motion dated 28.10.2021 within a petition of even date)· [2021] KEELC 984 (KLR)

Ferankline Muriira M’Nkanata v Adjudication Officer Ruiri/Rwarera Adjudication Section & 2 others; Annah Mwari Mutuma & 3 others (Interested Parties) [2021] KEELC 984 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
17 November 2021
1,083 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's land court refused emergency protection over land still under adjudication, confirming disputes must follow the Land Adjudication Act process before going to court.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The petitioner moved the Environment and Land Court at Meru by notice of motion under Section 68 of the Land Registration Act, various constitutional articles and the Civil Procedure Act, seeking inhibition and temporary injunctions restraining dealings, eviction, disposal and issuance of title deeds over Parcels Nos. 283, 3483, 3484, 3485 and 3486 Ruiri/Rwarera adjudication section, pending determination of a petition alleging infringement of his Article 40 property rights. He claimed the 1st and 2nd respondents had illegally amended adjudication records to insert the interested parties' names, and that his objections had been dismissed, after which he obtained a consent to sue dated 14.1.2020. Neither the respondents nor the interested parties filed replies. The court (Nzili ELC J) dismissed the application. It held that the Land Registration Act applies only after the adjudication register is certified complete and records forwarded to the Chief Land Registrar; the supporting affidavit did not show title deeds had issued, so relief under that statute was premature. The court further held that claiming constitutional infringement does not replace the internal dispute mechanisms of the Land Adjudication Act, including appeal to the Minister, citing Article 159(2)(d) and Supreme Court authority. The injunction could also not issue against the 2nd respondent whose statutory role did not cover land under adjudication. The application was dismissed with costs to the respondents and interested parties. The main petition remains to be dealt with separately.

Key legal issues

#
01

Applicability of Section 68 Land Registration Act remedies to land under adjudication

Holding

Section 68 remedies were unavailable because the suit land remains governed by the Land Adjudication Act; the adjudication register had not been declared complete and no title deeds had issued

Reasoning

The court noted the adjudication process had only reached the objection stage by 4.05.2018 and the supporting affidavit did not state whether title deeds had been issued or the register certified complete under Section 26 of the Land Adjudication Act. Orders under the Land Registration Act would therefore be premature.

p. 2
02

Exhaustion of internal dispute resolution mechanisms

Holding

A constitutional claim does not displace the obligation to pursue objections and appeals under the Land Adjudication Act, including appeal to the Minister under Section 26 and thereafter judicial review in the High Court

Reasoning

The court read the Land Adjudication Act together with the Fair Administrative Action Act 2015 and Article 159(2)(d), holding that internal mechanisms must be invoked before constitutional litigation. The record did not show the petitioner appealed to the Minister after his objections were dismissed.

p. 2
03

Injunction against a party with no statutory role over the suit land

Holding

Temporary injunction could not issue against the 2nd respondent because the Land Registrar's role under the Land Act and Land Registration Act does not cover land under adjudication

Reasoning

The petition and notice of motion did not state what role the 2nd respondent played regarding the suit land. Issuing injunctions against a party whose statutory jurisdiction does not cover the property would contravene the Constitution. Conservatory orders might have been considered, but that was not what was sought.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A claim of constitutional infringement does not excuse a party from first exhausting the internal dispute resolution mechanisms provided by statute
  • The Land Registration Act applies only after the adjudication register has been certified complete and records forwarded to the Chief Land Registrar

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The notice of motion dated 28.10.2020 is dismissed with costs to the respondents and the interested parties

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Land Registration ActSection 68
  • Constitution of KenyaArticles 1, 2, 3, 10, 11, 20, 21, 22, 23, 27, 28, 40, 47, 50, 73, 75, 159(2)(d)
  • Civil Procedure ActSections 1A, 1B, 3 and 3A
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 51
  • Land Adjudication Act (Cap 284)Section 26
  • Fair Administrative Actions Act, 2015Not specified
  • Land ActNot specified

Cases cited (2)

  • Samuel Kamau Macharia & Another -vs- Kenya Commercial Bank Ltd. & 2 Others
    [2012] eKLR
  • Speaker of National Assembly -vs- James Njenga Karume
    [1992] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Constitution of Kenya (Articles 1, 2, 3, 10, 11, 20, 21, 22, 23, 27, 28, 47, 50, 73, 75) and Section 68 of the Land Registration Act; Civil Procedure Act Sections 1A, 1B, 3 & 3A and Order 51 of the Civil Procedure Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Ferankline Muriira M’Nkanata v Adjudication Officer Ruiri/Rwarera Adjudication Section & 2 others; Annah Mwari Mutuma & 3 others (Interested Parties) [2021] KEELC 984 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Not stated in judgment (notice of motion dated 28.10.2021 within a petition of even date). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2021/984/eng@2021-11-17

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.