Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Caselaw
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCOther· [2021] KEELC 833 (KLR)

Jessicah Atieno George t/a Blooming Agencies v Letshego Kenya Limited & another [2021] KEELC 833 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court (court name not expressly stated in the judgment; single Judge sitting at Kisumu)
18 November 2021
AOAntony Ombwayo
614 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~2 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Environment and Land Court at Kisumu refused to hear a property auction dispute, ruling it was a commercial matter for the High Court.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The plaintiff, a businesswoman trading as Blooming Agency, sued Letshego Kenya Limited (a microfinance institution) and Regent Auctioneers, seeking a permanent injunction to restrain the sale by public auction or privately of her property LR No. Kisumu/Bar/2734, together with an order allowing settlement of outstanding loan arrears of Kshs. 3,300,000 by monthly installments of Kshs. 60,000. She had borrowed Kshs. 4,000,000 in May 2019, secured by legal charges over LR No. Kisumu/Bar/2734 and LR No. Kisumu/Konya/3368, repaid Kshs. 700,000, and attributed her default to the COVID-19 pandemic's effect on her business. She pleaded willingness to pay and accused the first defendant of instructing the second defendant to issue a redemption notice and notification of sale. Alongside the suit she applied for a temporary injunction pending hearing. The court did not reach the merits of the injunction. After perusing the plaint and the application, it held that the suit revolved on a commercial dispute over which it had no jurisdiction, and transferred the matter to the High Court for hearing and determination. The ruling was delivered electronically by email pursuant to COVID-19 court operations directives issued by the Chief Justice on 15th March 2020. No costs order was made and no authorities were cited. The practical effect is that the plaintiff's injunction application remains undetermined and must be pursued in the High Court.

Key legal issues

#
01

Jurisdiction over a loan and charge enforcement dispute

Holding

The court lacks jurisdiction as the dispute is commercial and belongs to the High Court

Reasoning

The plaintiff obtained loan facilities of Kshs. 4,000,000 secured by legal charges over two Kisumu properties, and the dispute concerned the lender's instructed sale by public auction over payment arrears. The court characterised the controversy as commercial in nature, outside its mandate, and on its own motion transferred the suit to the High Court rather than determining the injunction application.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A dispute founded on a loan facility and enforcement of a charge is a commercial dispute outside the jurisdiction of this court

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Transfer of the suit to the High Court for hearing and determination

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Companies ActCap 486
Jurisdiction invoked
Not expressly cited; the court declined jurisdiction on the basis that the dispute is commercial rather than within its mandate

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Jessicah Atieno George t/a Blooming Agencies v Letshego Kenya Limited & another [2021] KEELC 833 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). . Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2021/833/eng@2021-11-18

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.