Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedNotice of Motion dated 27th January, 2021 (appeal against judgment in Kilgoris Principal Magistrate ELC No. 22 of 2019)· [2021] KEELC 728 (KLR)

Fred Wafula Wamalwa v William Kalayo Nkeiyua [2021] KEELC 728 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
30 November 2021
790 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court halted execution of a land judgment, holding Covid-19 court closures justified an 11-month delay in seeking a stay pending appeal.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
By a Notice of Motion dated 27th January 2021 brought under Order 42 Rule 6(1) and (2) of the Civil Procedure Rules and Sections 3 and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act, the Applicant sought a stay of execution of the judgment delivered on 27th February 2020 in Kilgoris Principal Magistrate ELC No. 22 of 2019 (Fred Wafula Wamalwa v William Kalayo Nkeiya), the ensuing decree and any consequential orders, pending the hearing and determination of his appeal. He contended that execution was imminent, that the appeal would be rendered nugatory, that the application was made without undue delay and that he was ready to furnish security. The Respondent opposed through grounds of opposition, terming the application scandalous, an abuse of process and a delay of cost recovery, and asserted he had no interest in the Applicant's parcel Transmara/Shartuka/376 but only in parcel 153. Applying the established conditions in Antoine Ndiaye v Africa Virtual University (2015) eKLR, the court found substantial loss likely since land is emotive and a factor of production; it excused the roughly year-long delay, taking judicial notice of the Covid-19 pandemic and court closures; and noted the Applicant's readiness to abide by conditions. The court allowed the motion in terms of prayers 2, 3 and 4, staying execution pending the appeal, with costs in the cause. The ruling was delivered virtually at Migori on 30th November 2021.

Key legal issues

#
01

Substantial loss

Holding

The Applicant would likely suffer substantial loss if execution of the decree over land proceeds, as land is emotive and a factor of production

Reasoning

The court noted that land in Kenya is emotive and a factor of production and economic activity, so commencing execution would likely cause the Applicant loss. The Respondent in any event disclaimed interest in the Applicant's parcel, meaning no prejudice would flow to him from a stay.

p. 1
02

Undue delay

Holding

The delay of about eleven months in filing was justified by the Covid-19 pandemic and closure of courts

Reasoning

Judgment was delivered on 27/2/2020 and the application made on 27/1/2021, over a year later. The court took judicial notice that the country faced the Covid-19 pandemic, courts were closed and normal life curtailed, and therefore the delay was excused.

p. 2
03

Security

Holding

The Applicant expressed readiness to abide by any condition the court would set

Reasoning

The Applicant contended he was ready to abide by any condition the court would set as a prerequisite for the orders sought; on that basis the security limb was satisfied and the motion allowed in terms of prayers 2, 3 and 4.

p. 1

Legal principles established

#
  • Conditions for grant of stay of execution are substantial loss, application made without undue delay, and furnishing of security

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Stay of execution of the judgment delivered on 27th February, 2020 in Kilgoris Principal Magistrate ELC No. 22 of 2019, the ensuing decree and any consequential orders, granted in terms of prayers 2, 3 and 4 of the Notice of Motion dated 27th January, 2021

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 42 Rule 6(1) and (2)
  • Civil Procedure ActSections 3 and 3A

Cases cited (1)

  • Antoine Ndiaye =vs= Africa Virtual University
    (2015) eKLR
On appeal from
Kilgoris Principal Magistrate's Court (ELC)
ELC No. 22 of 2019
Jurisdiction invoked
Order 42 Rule 6(1) and (2) of the Civil Procedure Rules and Sections 3 and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Fred Wafula Wamalwa v William Kalayo Nkeiyua [2021] KEELC 728 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Notice of Motion dated 27th January, 2021 (appeal against judgment in Kilgoris Principal Magistrate ELC No. 22 of 2019). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2021/728/eng@2021-11-30

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.