Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedELC Case No. 3 of 2018 (Garissa)· [2021] KEELC 672 (KLR)

County Government of Tana River v Bocha & 10 others (Environment and Land Case 16 of 2018) [2021] KEELC 672 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
26 November 2021
1,864 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court annulled the sale of unregistered community land, confirming counties cannot sell it and private buyers get no valid title.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The County Government of Tana River sued eleven defendants over approximately 700 metres along River Tana and 4,500 metres towards the main road at Hagulcho Area, Madogo, seeking an interlocutory and permanent injunction, a declaration that the land is unregistered community land held in trust for the Munyoyaya community, annulment of a Sale Agreement dated 6th November 2017, general damages and costs. The plaintiff alleged the 1st to 10th Defendants had irregularly sold the unregistered, unsurveyed community land to the 11th Defendant without authority. The defendants filed no defence; their case was marked closed after the plaintiff's case, and the court proceeded on uncontroverted evidence. PW1, Abdullahi Adhan Ashako, testified that the Munyoyaya community of six clans has occupied the land since pre-colonial times, and PW2, a county physical planner, testified that the land is community land held in trust and evidenced a county task force and adjudication programme. Applying Article 63(3) and 64 of the Constitution and Section 6 of the Community Land Act, the court held that unregistered community land is held by the County Government in trust and cannot be sold or disposed of; the defendants had no capacity to alienate the land, rendering the sale irregular and illegal. The court declared the suit property unregistered community land held in trust by the plaintiff, annulled the sale agreement, and issued a permanent injunction against interference pending adjudication and issuance of community title. The claim for general damages failed for want of proof. Costs with interest were awarded to the plaintiff jointly and severally against the defendants. Judgment delivered virtually at Garissa on 26th November 2021 by E.C. Cherono, ELC Judge.

Key legal issues

#
01

Status of the suit property

Holding

The suit property is unregistered, unsurveyed community land held in trust by the County Government of Tana River for the Munyoyaya community

Reasoning

Article 63(3) of the Constitution provides that unregistered community land is held by the County Government in trust for communities, and Section 6 of the Community Land Act imposes the same trust obligation. The plaintiff's evidence that the land is unregistered community land was uncontroverted as the defendants did not file a defence or participate in the trial.

p. 4
02

Validity of the sale of unregistered community land

Holding

The Sale Agreement dated 6th November 2017 selling the suit property to the 11th Defendant is null and void

Reasoning

Article 64 prohibits disposition of community land except as provided by legislation, and Section 6(8) of the Community Land Act bars a County Government from selling unregistered community land, while Section 6(6) requires any transaction over such land to comply with the Act. The defendants neither proved conversion of the land to private property nor had capacity to alienate it, rendering the sale irregular and illegal.

p. 4
03

General damages

Holding

The claim for general damages failed for lack of proof

Reasoning

Although the plaintiff pleaded general damages with interest, its witnesses did not address the particulars of the loss. Unquantified and unproved loss cannot ground an award of general damages, so that head of relief was refused despite the suit otherwise succeeding.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • Unregistered community land is held by the County Government in trust for the communities for which it is held
  • A County Government cannot sell or dispose of unregistered community land it holds in trust, and private transactions over such land are invalid
  • Individuals have no authority to alienate unregistered community land; any such sale is irregular and illegal and liable to be revoked

Court orders

#
  1. 1.A declaration that the Suit Property is an unregistered community land held in trust by the plaintiff on behalf of the local community and that the Sale Agreement dated 6th November 2017 is null and void and is annulled
  2. 2.A permanent injunction restraining the defendants jointly and/or severally, their agents and employees, from clearing bushes, dealing in, trespassing, fencing, transferring, disposing, erecting structures or otherwise interfering with the suit property and other community land owned by the local community until land adjudication is commenced and completed and title documents issued
  3. 3.Costs of the suit with interest at court rates from the date of judgment till payment in full, borne by the defendants jointly and severally

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 63(2), 63(3), 64
  • Community Land Act No. 27 of 2016Section 6, Section 12, Section 18

Cases cited (5)

  • County Government of Tana River v Binesa Wato Danko & 3 others
    [2020] eKLR
  • Naftali Ruthi Kinyua v Patrick Thuita Gachure & Another
    [2015] eKLR
  • Bahola Mkalindi Rhigo & 9 Others v Micheal Seth Kaseme & 3 others
    [2016] eKLR
  • Nguruman Limited v Jan Blonde Nielsen & 2 Others
    CA 2014 eKLR
  • American Cyanamid Co. v Ethicon Ltd
    (1975) 2 WLR 316
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 63(3) of the Constitution and the Community Land Act, No. 27 of 2016 (Environment and Land Court original jurisdiction)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "County Government of Tana River v Bocha & 10 others (Environment and Land Case 16 of 2018) [2021] KEELC 672 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). ELC Case No. 3 of 2018 (Garissa). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2021/672/eng@2021-11-26

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.