Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNotice of Motion dated 7th April 2021 (arising from an appeal against Kakamega MCELC No. 381 of 2018)· [2021] KEELC 649 (KLR)

Stanley Amwayi Were v Frida Omari Gardison & 3 others [2021] KEELC 649 (KLR)

High Court of Kenya
30 November 2021
654 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The High Court at Kakamega dismissed a request to protect land pending appeal because the applicant waited three months and argued nothing.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling of the High Court at Kakamega (D. O. Ohungo, J) disposed of a Notice of Motion dated 7th April 2021 in which the appellant, aggrieved by a ruling of the Chief Magistrate's Court at Kakamega (Hon. E. Malesi, PM) delivered on 12th January 2021 in Kakamega MCELC No. 381 of 2018, sought a temporary injunction restraining the respondents from disposing of, alienating, encumbering or otherwise dealing with Title No. Butsotso/Shibeye/1002 pending the hearing and determination of his appeal. The application was anchored on Order 42 rule 6(6) of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010. The appellant deposed that the respondents threatened to evict him and that his appeal would be rendered nugatory; the 4th respondent denied any intention to alienate or waste the property and termed the application a waste of the court's time. The respondents, in submissions, argued the Giella v Cassman Brown test had not been met. The court held that the test for an injunction pending appeal mirrors that for stay of execution - substantial loss, absence of unreasonable delay, and security. Finding the application filed about three months after the ruling (and two months after filing the appeal), the court held there was unreasonable delay; and, since the appellant filed no submissions, it found no demonstration of substantial loss. The court dismissed the motion with costs to abide the outcome of the appeal.

Key legal issues

#
01

Unreasonable delay in applying for injunction pending appeal

Holding

A delay of about three months from the ruling, and two months from filing the appeal, to the date of the application was unreasonable

Reasoning

The ruling appealed from was delivered on 12 January 2021 and the application was filed on 8 April 2021, about three months later. Even measured from the filing of the appeal on 9 February 2021, two months elapsed before the application was lodged under certificate of urgency. The court therefore was not persuaded the application was brought without unreasonable delay, an essential limb of the test.

p. 2
02

Substantial loss

Holding

The appellant failed to demonstrate substantial loss, particularly as he filed no submissions or arguments in support

Reasoning

Although the appellant deposed that respondents threatened eviction and that the appeal would be rendered nugatory, the 4th respondent denied any threat of alienation. Crucially, after filing the application the appellant advanced no arguments - the respondents filed submissions but the applicant did not. On that state of the record the court found no demonstration of substantial loss.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • The test for a temporary injunction pending appeal mirrors that for stay of execution: substantial loss, no unreasonable delay, and security for due performance of the decree

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Notice of Motion dated 7th April 2021 dismissed
  2. 2.Costs to abide the outcome of the appeal

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010Order 42 rule 6(6)

Cases cited (3)

  • Giella v Cassman Brown & Co Ltd
    [1973] EA 358
  • Kenya Power & Lighting Co. Ltd v Kigaita Ngare Unduthu & 36 others
    [2020] eKLR
  • Kenya Shell Limited v Benjamin Karuga Kibiru & another
    [1986] eKLR
On appeal from
Chief Magistrate's Court at Kakamega
Kakamega MCELC No. 381 of 2018
Jurisdiction invoked
Order 42 rule 6(6) of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010 (appellate jurisdiction to grant temporary injunction)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Stanley Amwayi Were v Frida Omari Gardison & 3 others [2021] KEELC 649 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Notice of Motion dated 7th April 2021 (arising from an appeal against Kakamega MCELC No. 381 of 2018). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2021/649/eng@2021-11-30

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.