Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNot stated in the judgment (Notice of Motion dated 15/9/2021)· [2021] KEELC 624 (KLR)

Mathew Namusei Chahasi v Cooperative Bank Limited & another [2021] KEELC 624 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
29 November 2021
3,950 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~16 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Environment and Land Court dismissed a borrower's suit challenging a bank's charge, ruling the real dispute was about loan accounts, which belongs to the High Court.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Plaintiff moved the Environment and Land Court at Kitale by Notice of Motion dated 15/9/2021 seeking temporary injunctions restraining the 1st Defendant from repossessing, selling or interfering with L.R. No. 8699/18 (I.R. No. 121934) in Kitale, and from enforcing agreements under which his land was charged as security for a loan obtained by the 2nd Defendant. While preparing a ruling on the merits, the court raised the question of its own jurisdiction and invited further submissions. Applying Owners of the Motor Vessel 'Lillian S' and Samuel Kamau Macharia, the court traced the ELC's jurisdiction to Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution and Section 13 of the ELC Act. It accepted Munyao J's reasoning (in Lydia Nyambura Mbugua and as approved in Alphose Yankulije) that the ELC has jurisdiction over the validity, enforcement and realization of charges and instruments on land, while distinguishing the Court of Appeal's decision in Cooperative Bank v Kangethe Njuguna, which held that accounts and collection of dues fall outside the ELC. Reading the pleadings and affidavits, the court found the Applicant did not dispute the charge; he had paid Kshs 4,000,000 and affirmed the contract. His real complaint - lack of statements of account, excessive interest, penalties and the duplum rule - was purely one of accounts, reserved for the Commercial Division of the High Court. Allegations of fraud, coercion, illegality and lack of spousal consent were viewed as attempts to disguise the true issue. The court also deprecated the 1st Respondent's counsel for plagiarizing portions of the Cooperative Bank judgment. The court held it lacked jurisdiction, dismissed the suit with costs to the Defendants, and vacated the interim status quo orders.

Key legal issues

#
01

Source of ELC jurisdiction

Holding

The ELC's jurisdiction flows from Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution as read with Section 13 of the ELC Act, covering environmental and land disputes including contracts and instruments granting enforceable interests in land

Reasoning

The court traced jurisdiction from Article 162(2)(b) and (3) of the Constitution to the Environment and Land Court Act, Section 13(1)-(3), which confers original and appellate jurisdiction over environmental and land disputes, including disputes relating to public, private and community land and contracts or instruments granting enforceable interests in land. Jurisdiction must be ascertained before a court proceeds to the merits.

p. 2
02

Whether disputes over a charge fall within ELC jurisdiction

Holding

Disputes over the validity, enforcement and realization of charges and instruments on land fall within ELC jurisdiction, but accounts and collection of levies and dues fall within the High Court Commercial Division

Reasoning

Distinguishing Cooperative Bank v Kangethe Njuguna, the court held that while a charge is an interest in land and the ELC is the only court with jurisdiction over disputes arising from instruments created under the Land Act and Registration of Titles Act, issues of rendering accounts and collection of levies and dues stand alone within the Commercial Division of the High Court.

p. 3
03

Predominant issue in this suit

Holding

The predominant issue was accounts in respect of the loan, not the charge instrument, so the ELC lacks jurisdiction

Reasoning

Reading the pleadings, witness statement and affidavits, the Applicant's complaint concerned periodic statements, reconciliation of accounts, excessive interest, penalties and the duplum rule. He affirmed the charge by part-payment of Kshs 4,000,000 and did not dispute the charge instrument; allegations of fraud, coercion, illegality or matrimonial property were ancillary attempts to disguise the real issue of accounts.

p. 4
04

Counsel's plagiarism in submissions

Holding

The 1st Respondent's counsel copied paragraphs of the Cooperative Bank judgment word for word as his own submissions, which the court deprecated

Reasoning

The court criticized counsel for lifting paragraphs 25, 26, 27, 35, 36 and 41 of the Cooperative Bank of Kenya judgment verbatim and presenting them as his own thinking, adding only two sentences, and advised counsel to be intellectually honest and give credit to sources of information given to the courts.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Jurisdiction is everything; without it a court has no power to take any step in a matter
  • A court may only exercise jurisdiction conferred by the Constitution or written law and cannot expand it by judicial craft
  • The ELC has jurisdiction over the validity, enforcement and realization of instruments created on land, but not over disputes on accounts, collection of levies and dues, which fall to the Commercial Division of the High Court
  • The predominant issue in a suit is gathered from the pleadings, documents, witness statements, affidavits and prayers

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The suit is dismissed with costs to the Defendants
  2. 2.The interim orders of maintenance of status quo issued on 15/11/2021 in favour of the Applicant are vacated
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(2)(b) and 162(3) of the Constitution as read with Sections 13 and 30 of the Environment and Land Court Act, No. 19 of 2011

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Later judgments citing this (1)

#

Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Mathew Namusei Chahasi v Cooperative Bank Limited & another [2021] KEELC 624 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Not stated in the judgment (Notice of Motion dated 15/9/2021). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2021/624/eng@2021-11-29

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.