Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedNotice of Motion dated 9th March, 2021 (Advocate/Client Bill of Costs)· [2021] KEELC 564 (KLR)

Muri Mwaniki & Wamiti Advocates v Wedge Wood Supplies (K) Limited [2021] KEELC 564 (KLR)

High Court of Kenya
7 December 2021
910 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan advocate recovered taxed costs from a former client but lost 14% interest because no demand or claim for interest was made before payment.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was a Notice of Motion dated 9th March 2021 brought by the Advocate/Applicant, Njuguna Muri, under section 51(2) of the Advocates Act and Regulation 7 of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order, seeking entry of judgment against the Respondent client for Kshs. 192,523.2/-, being taxed and certified costs, plus interest at 14% per annum from 18th July 2018 and costs of the application. The bill of costs had been taxed on 20th November 2018. The Respondent did not file a response but appeared through counsel, Mr. Githui, who conceded prayer 1 and opposed only the interest and costs prayers, arguing that Regulation 7 is discretionary ('may') and that no demand for payment or claim for interest was ever made after taxation. The Court, E. K. Wabwoto J, applied section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, under which a taxing officer's certificate is final as to the amount of costs unless set aside or altered, and entered judgment against the Respondent for the certified sum of Kshs. 192,523.2/=. On interest, the Court held that Regulation 7 requires not only service of the bill but also that a claim for interest be raised before the bill is paid or tendered in full; there was no evidence of demand or of such a claim, so prayer 2 failed. On costs, exercising its discretion and noting the Respondent's concession and the advocate-client relationship, the Court directed each party to bear its own costs. The application was accordingly allowed only in terms of prayer 1. Judgment was delivered virtually at Nairobi on 7th December 2021.

Key legal issues

#
01

Entry of judgment for taxed costs under section 51(2) of the Advocates Act

Holding

Judgment was entered for the certified sum of Kshs. 192,523.2/= since the Certificate of Taxation was not disputed and the Respondent conceded prayer 1

Reasoning

Section 51(2) makes the taxing officer's certificate final as to the amount of costs unless set aside or altered by the Court. The Respondent was properly served, did not dispute the Certificate of Taxation dated 20th November 2018, and conceded prayer 1 at the hearing. The Court therefore entered judgment for the certified sum.

p. 1
02

Entitlement to interest under Regulation 7 of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order

Holding

Interest was refused because the Advocate neither proved a demand for payment nor raised a claim for interest with the Respondent

Reasoning

Regulation 7 permits interest at 14% per annum from expiry of one month from delivery of the bill, provided the claim for interest is raised before the bill is paid or tendered in full. Although the bill was served on 28th May 2018, there was no evidence of demand for payment or of a claim for interest being raised. The proviso was not satisfied and the discretionary word 'may' did not assist the Applicant.

p. 2
03

Costs of the application

Holding

Each party directed to bear own costs in light of the Respondent's concession and the advocate-client relationship

Reasoning

The Court exercised its ultimate discretion on costs, considering the outcome and the circumstances of the case: the Respondent did not resist the substantive prayer but conceded it on the hearing date, and there was no cogent evidence whether payment had been made earlier after the certificate of taxed costs was obtained.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Under Regulation 7 of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order, interest is chargeable only where one month has lapsed from delivery of the bill AND the advocate has raised a claim for interest before the amount of the bill has been paid or tendered in full

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Judgment entered against the Respondent for the taxed costs of Kshs. 192,523.2/= as per the Certificate of Taxation dated 20th November, 2018
  2. 2.Prayer (2) for interest dismissed
  3. 3.Each party to bear own costs of the proceedings

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Advocates ActSection 51(2)
  • Advocates (Remuneration) OrderRegulation 7
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act and Regulation 7 of the Advocates (Remuneration) Order

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Muri Mwaniki & Wamiti Advocates v Wedge Wood Supplies (K) Limited [2021] KEELC 564 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Notice of Motion dated 9th March, 2021 (Advocate/Client Bill of Costs). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2021/564/eng@2021-12-07

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.