Francis Thuku Gakomo & another v Joseph Gitau Njoki & 3 others [2021] KEELC 325 (KLR)
The bottom line
#A Kenyan landowner who doesn't defend an eviction case loses automatically — the court granted a permanent injunction, eviction and Kshs.100,000 monthly damages without opposition.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether the Applicants were entitled to a permanent injunction, eviction orders and ancillary relief over Kiambaa/Ruaka/611 and Kiambaa/Ruaka/1075
The application was allowed in its entirety as it was unopposed and the Applicants' facts were uncontroverted, following the earlier judgment declaring them lawful owners
The court noted that it had previously stayed proceedings pending HCCC No. 1995 of 98 and had on 11th June 2020 delivered a judgment declaring the Plaintiffs the legal and/or lawful owners of the suit property. The application was not opposed and the facts were not controverted, so the court found merit and allowed the application in its entirety.
Legal principles established
#- Where an application is unopposed and the facts presented are not controverted, the court may allow the application on the uncontroverted material
Court orders
#- 1.The Notice of Motion dated 11th January 2021 is allowed in its entirety, being unopposed and uncontroverted
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Section 152E of the Land Act, 2012; ELC Act Section 13(1) and (2); Sections 1, 3 and 63 and Orders 21, 22, 26, 38, 40, 48 and 51 of the Civil Procedure Rules and the Civil Procedure Act
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Francis Thuku Gakomo & another v Joseph Gitau Njoki & 3 others [2021] KEELC 325 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Not stated in judgment (Notice of Motion dated 11th January 2021). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2021/325/eng@2021-12-02
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.