Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedELC Case No. 24 of 2018· [2021] KEELC 245 (KLR)

County Government of Tana River v Mohamed Gorre Bulale & 3 others [2021] KEELC 245 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
17 December 2021
2,556 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~10 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court voided the sale of unregistered community land, confirming that no individual can sell land held in trust for a community.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The County Government of Tana River, as plaintiff, sued four defendants seeking an interlocutory injunction, a declaration that an approximately 250-metre by 3.5-kilometre tract of land at Damjalley Area, Madogo Ward is unregistered community land held in trust by the County and revocation of the sale agreement dated 14th December 2017, a permanent injunction, general damages, and costs. The defendants, who allegedly purchased the land from the 3rd and 4th defendants, filed no defence and did not participate at trial; their case was marked closed. The plaintiff called two witnesses: a clan leader of the Munyoyaya community who testified that the land is family/community land sold without authority, and the Tana North Sub-County physical planner, who described the County's role as trustee, the appointment of an adjudication officer, and the difficulties of registering community land. The court framed the central issue as the sale of unregistered community land and whether the defendants had authority and capacity to effect it. Relying on Article 63 and 64 of the Constitution and Sections 6, 12 and 18 of the Community Land Act, the court held that the suit property is unregistered community land held in trust by the County Government, that the defendants had no right to alienate or sell it, and that the sale was irregular, illegal, null and void. The sale agreement was revoked and a permanent injunction issued protecting the land pending completion of the adjudication programme. The claim for general damages failed for want of proof of particulars. Costs with interest at court rates were awarded to the plaintiff, borne by the defendants jointly and severally.

Key legal issues

#
01

Status of the suit property as unregistered community land

Holding

The suit property is unregistered and un-surveyed community land held in trust by the County Government of Tana River on behalf of the Munyoyaya community.

Reasoning

The plaintiff's testimony that the suit property is unregistered and un-surveyed community land held in trust by the County Government was unchallenged and uncontroverted, as the defendants filed no defence and did not participate in the trial. Article 63(3) of the Constitution and Section 6 of the Community Land Act place unregistered community land in the hands of county governments as trustees.

p. 3
02

Validity of the sale of unregistered community land by individual defendants

Holding

The sale agreement dated 14th December 2017 was irregular, illegal, null and void, and was revoked/annulled.

Reasoning

The 3rd and 4th defendants had no authority or capacity to alienate or sell unregistered community land; they showed no process to convert the land to private property and did not engage the community or the County Government. Article 64 prohibits disposition of community land except as provided by legislation, and Section 6(8) of the Community Land Act bars sale or disposal of unregistered community land held in trust.

p. 3
03

Claim for general damages

Holding

The claim for general damages was not proved and was refused.

Reasoning

Although the plaint pleaded general damages and the nature of those damages was categorised at the hearing, the plaintiff's witnesses did not testify on the particulars of the loss, so the claim was not proved to the required standard.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Community land cannot be individually owned against the interest of the larger community, and any sale of community land that does not adhere to the Community Land Act and the Constitution, including public participation and involvement of vulnerable members, is illegal and discriminatory.
  • Unregistered community land is held by the County Government in trust for the communities for which it is held, and cannot be disposed of otherwise than in accordance with the Community Land Act.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.A declaration that the Suit Property is and remains unregistered and un-surveyed community land held in trust by the plaintiff on behalf of the local community, and revocation/annulment of the Sale Agreement dated 14th December 2017
  2. 2.A permanent injunction restraining the defendants jointly and/or severally, their agents and employees, from clearing bushes, dealing in, trespassing, fencing, transferring, disposing, erecting structures or otherwise interfering with the suit property and any other community land owned by the local community until the land adjudication programme is commenced and completed and community land title documents are issued
  3. 3.Costs of the suit with interest at court rates from the date of judgment till payment in full, borne by the defendants jointly and severally

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 63 (including 63(3)); Article 64
  • Community Land Act, No. 27 of 2016Section 6 (including 6(6) and 6(8)); Section 12; Section 18

Cases cited (7)

  • Naftali Ruthi Kinyua v Patrick Thuita Gachure & Another
    [2015] eKLR
  • Bahola Mkalindi Rhigo & 9 Others v Micheal Seth Kaseme & 3 Others
    [2016] eKLR
  • Nguruman Limited v Jan Blonde Nielsen & 2 Others
    CA 2014 eKLR
  • American Cyanamid Co. v Ethicon Ltd
    (1975) 2 WLR 316
  • County Government of Tana River v Binesa Wato Danko & 3 Others
    [2020] eKLR
  • County Government of Tana River v Dakane Shake Bocha & 10 Others (ELC Case No. 16 of 2018)
  • County Government of Tana River v Mohammed Amin Muhumed & 3 Others (ELC Case No. 25 of 2018)
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 63 and 64 of the Constitution and the Community Land Act, No. 27 of 2016

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Later judgments citing this (1)

#

Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "County Government of Tana River v Mohamed Gorre Bulale & 3 others [2021] KEELC 245 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). ELC Case No. 24 of 2018. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2021/245/eng@2021-12-17

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.