Derick Masini Onami v Josam Ibwana [2021] KEELC 104 (KLR)
The bottom line
#Kenya's Environment and Land Court ruled that an adverse possession claim survives a landowner's death and can proceed to a full hearing.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether the preliminary objection was a valid one in law
The objection satisfied the Mukisa Biscuit threshold as it raised pure points of law arising from the pleadings
The court applied the Mukisa Biscuit test, which requires a preliminary objection to be a pure point of law pleaded or arising by clear implication from the pleadings, capable of disposing of the suit, and argued on the assumption that all facts pleaded by the opposite side are correct. The objection rested on Section 7 of the Civil Procedure Act and sections 7, 9, 13, 37 and 38 of the Limitation of Actions Act, so it met the threshold.
Whether the suit is res judicata given the earlier ruling in the succession cause
The suit is not res judicata because the succession ruling was not final on the adverse possession claim and the ELC has jurisdiction over the subject matter
Applying the elements in John Florence Maritime Services, the court held that the ruling of Justice C. Kariuki in the succession cause was not final as far as the adverse possession claim was concerned, since the court had expressly given the plaintiff leeway to file such a claim in the Environment and Land Court, the court with jurisdiction over the subject matter. Hence the claim was never finally adjudicated by a court with jurisdiction.
Whether the Originating Summons was filed prematurely before the expiry of twelve years
The suit was not premature; death of the registered owner does not stop time running for adverse possession
Relying on section 16 of the Limitation of Actions Act, section 30(f) of the repealed Registered Land Act (now section 28(h) of the Land Registration Act) and section 2(1) of the Law Reform Act, the court held that a claim of adverse possession survives the death of the title holder and time continues to run against the estate. The plaintiff claimed to have entered the land in 1995, so time had run well beyond twelve years before suit.
Whether the suit is an abuse of the court process
No abuse of court process
The abuse-of-process complaint was premised on the suit being res judicata and premature, both of which findings failed. Since the suit was neither res judicata nor prematurely filed, the foundation for the abuse argument collapsed and the court found no abuse of process in filing the Originating Summons.
Legal principles established
#- A preliminary objection must be based on pure points of law, arising from the pleadings, argued on the assumption that all facts pleaded by the opposite party are correct
- Res judicata requires a final judgment by a court with jurisdiction, with identical parties, subject matter and cause of action
- Death of a registered owner of land does not stop time running for adverse possession
- A ruling that directs a claimant to file an adverse possession claim in the Environment and Land Court is not a final determination of that claim for res judicata purposes
Court orders
#- 1.The preliminary objection raised vide Notice of Preliminary Objection dated 4th November 2021 is dismissed
- 2.Costs to be in the cause
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Environment and Land Court jurisdiction over adverse possession claims, as directed by the High Court in the succession cause
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Later judgments citing this (2)
#Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.
- Thiongo & 2 others v Kariuki & 2 others (Land Case E348 of 2024 & Miscellaneous Application E151 of 2014 (Consolidated)) [2025] KEELC 995 (KLR)[2025] KEELC 995 (KLR)27 Feb 2025
- Mereu v Mwarangu (Environment & Land Case E002 of 2023) [2024] KEELC 5544 (KLR)[2024] KEELC 5544 (KLR)24 Jul 2024
Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Derick Masini Onami v Josam Ibwana [2021] KEELC 104 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2021). Not stated in the judgment (Originating Summons dated 1st February, 2018). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2021/104/eng@2021-12-07
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.