Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCStruck OutMalindi ELC (unnumbered in judgment; suit dated 28th March 2017)· [2020] KEELC 3788 (KLR)

Teddy Davis Ngala v Pola Charo Kaniki [2020] KEELC 3788 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
6 February 2020
1,276 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court struck out a second land lawsuit because the same dispute between the same people had already been decided in an earlier case.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was a Notice of Motion dated 6th July 2017 in which the Defendant, Pola Charo Kaniki alias Pola Ngala, sought the striking out of the Plaintiff Teddy Davis Ngala's suit as res judicata and an abuse of the process of the Court. The Plaintiff's Plaint, filed 28th March 2017, sought a declaration that his name be included in Plot No. 2390 Kilifi/Mtondia as administrator and beneficiary of the estate of Davis Ngala. The Defendant contended that the suit duplicated Malindi ELC No. 36 of 2013, previously filed by the same Plaintiff against her, which was fully heard and determined by Angote J on 11th July 2014, in which three acres were ordered excised and registered in the Plaintiff's name. The Plaintiff opposed, asserting the two suits concerned different prayers and different parcels. The court, per J.O. Olola J, perused the Plaint and found the Plaintiff himself narrated the chain of parcel numbers showing Kilifi/Mtondia/1893 became Kilifi/Mtondia/2390 after the three acres were carved out pursuant to the 2014 judgment - the same land and the same parties. Applying Section 7 of the Civil Procedure Act and the Court of Appeal's exposition in the IEBC v Maina Kiai case on the finality rationale of res judicata, the court held the Plaintiff had had his day in court and could not reopen the same dispute. Allowing the application, the court struck out the Plaintiff's suit with costs on 6th February 2020.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the present suit is res judicata under Section 7 of the Civil Procedure Act

Holding

The suit is res judicata because the same parcel of land (Kilifi/Mtondia/1893, later Kilifi/Mtondia/2390 after subdivision) and the same parties were before the Court in Malindi ELC No. 36 of 2013, which was heard and determined by Angote J on 11th July 2014.

Reasoning

The court compared the pleadings and found the Plaintiff himself traced the history of the disputed parcel, showing the former suit sought excision of three acres from the same parcel later registered as Kilifi/Mtondia/2390. The matter was directly and substantially in issue, between the same parties litigating under the same title, in a competent court, and was finally decided. The doctrine serves finality of litigation and protects against vexatious multiplicity of suits.

p. 2
02

Whether the suit amounts to an abuse of the process of the Court warranting striking out

Holding

Yes; being res judicata, the suit is an abuse of process and was struck out on the Defendant's application.

Reasoning

The Defendant applied to strike out the suit as res judicata and an abuse of process. Having found the Plaintiff had already had his day in court over the same property against the same Defendant in ELC No. 36 of 2013, the court was persuaded the application had merit and struck out the suit with costs.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A party who had the opportunity to litigate all issues concerning a property in a former suit between the same parties cannot reopen them in a subsequent suit; res judicata bars such multiplicity of litigation.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Defendant's Notice of Motion dated 6th July 2017 is allowed
  2. 2.The Plaintiff's suit is struck out
  3. 3.Costs of the suit awarded to the Defendant

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure ActSection 7

Cases cited (1)

  • Independent Electoral Boundaries Commission –vs- Maina Kiai & 5 Others
    Nairobi CA Civil Appeal No. 105 of 2017 (2017)eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Original jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court; doctrine of res judicata under Section 7 of the Civil Procedure Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Teddy Davis Ngala v Pola Charo Kaniki [2020] KEELC 3788 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). Malindi ELC (unnumbered in judgment; suit dated 28th March 2017). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2020/3788/eng@2020-02-06

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.