Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedJudicial Review Application (Notice of Motion) dated 17th December 2018· [2020] KEELC 3725 (KLR)

Ex Parte Applicants Said Mbili Adam & 23 others v The National Land Commission & another Bajaber Salt Works Limited (Interested Party) [2020] KEELC 3725 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
23 January 2020
1,719 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's High Court-level Environment and Land Court quashed the National Land Commission's revocation of 24 Lamu residents' land titles, ruling the Commission cannot run parallel proceedings when a land dispute is already before the court.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The 24 Ex-Parte Applicants, residents of Lamu County claiming to be registered proprietors of LR Nos 12852/311-434, moved the Court by Notice of Motion dated 17th December 2018 under Order 53 of the Civil Procedure Rules seeking certiorari to quash the National Land Commission's determination gazetted vide Gazette Notice No. 11714 of 9th November 2018, which revoked their titles, upheld the Interested Party Bajaber Salt Works Ltd's title over LR No. 2678, and directed the Chief Land Registrar to implement the revocation. The Applicants contended the determination was illegal, irrational and made without due process, notably because the validity of the same titles was directly in issue in Malindi ELC No. 362 of 2016, in which the Commission was the 2nd Defendant and had filed a Statement of Defence. The Interested Party defended the determination as lawful and regular; the Chief Land Registrar opposed on grounds that he acted under Section 14(5) of the National Land Commission Act; the Commission filed no response. The court found from the Commission's own Report that it was aware of the pending suit yet proceeded with the hearing and determination. Invoking Articles 159(1) and 162(2)(b) of the Constitution, the court held the Commission was obliged to participate in the court proceedings and could not open parallel proceedings, making its determination sub judice and an abuse of process. The Motion was allowed as prayed with costs, quashing the Gazette Notice and prohibiting revocation of the Applicants' titles.

Key legal issues

#
01

Sub judice / parallel proceedings before the National Land Commission

Holding

The Commission's determination was an abuse of process and sub judice, since the validity of the same titles was directly in issue in Malindi ELC No. 362 of 2016 in which the Commission had filed pleadings.

Reasoning

The Commission was aware of the pending suit, as shown by its own Report recording counsel's advice not to proceed while the Malindi matter was pending. It nevertheless proceeded to hear some parties and determine the complaint. Article 159(1) vests judicial authority in the courts, and Article 162(2)(b) vests land disputes in the ELC. Having filed a defence in the suit, the Commission was obliged to participate there, not determine the dispute itself.

p. 3
02

Certiorari against ultra vires determinations

Holding

Certiorari lies to bring up and quash a decision of an inferior tribunal or authority made ultra vires.

Reasoning

The court invoked certiorari to quash the Gazette Notice determination because the Commission acted outside its proper remit by determining a matter already before the Court. The decision was therefore invalidated and the directive to the Chief Land Registrar fell with it.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Once a land dispute is pending before the Environment and Land Court, the National Land Commission must participate in those proceedings and may not open parallel proceedings and render its own decision.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Order of certiorari quashing the determination contained in Gazette Notice No. 11714 dated 9th November 2018 in respect of LR Nos 12852/311-434 and LR No. 2678 (CR 36668)
  2. 2.Prohibition restraining the 1st and 2nd Respondents from revoking the Applicants' Certificates of Title for LR Nos 12852/311-434 on the basis of the Gazette Notice
  3. 3.Costs of the Motion to the Ex-Parte Applicants

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 159(1); Article 162(2)(b)
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 53 Rules 3, 4, 5 and 6
  • National Land Commission Act, 2012Section 14(1); Section 14(5)

Cases cited (1)

  • Malindi ELC No. 362 of 2016; Bajaber Ltd & Another vs The Chief Land Registrar and 29 Others
Jurisdiction invoked
Articles 159(1) and 162(2)(b) of the Constitution; Order 53 Rules 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Ex Parte Applicants Said Mbili Adam & 23 others v The National Land Commission & another Bajaber Salt Works Limited (Interested Party) [2020] KEELC 3725 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). Judicial Review Application (Notice of Motion) dated 17th December 2018. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2020/3725/eng@2020-01-23

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.