Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedELC Case No. 217 of 2014· [2020] KEELC 3664 (KLR)

Azzuri Limited v George Kadenge Ziro & 5 others [2020] KEELC 3664 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
6 February 2020
2,281 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~9 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court stopped police investigations into a land title, ruling courts can halt criminal probes used to gain an unfair advantage in civil suits.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was a Notice of Motion dated 2nd November 2019 filed by the 1st and 4th Defendants in a pending suit by Azzuri Limited seeking specific performance of an agreement for sale of land parcel Kilifi/Chembe Kibabamshe/356. The Defendants sought joinder of the Officer-in-charge of DCI Malindi, an order stopping investigations into the title deed on the ground that they contravened the sub-judice principle and were intended to subvert the course of justice, and censure of the DCI and the Plaintiff. The application followed the arrest and interrogation of the 1st Defendant, George Kadenge Ziro, on 1st November 2019, days after the Plaintiff closed its case. The Plaintiff and the Attorney General opposed the application, relying on Section 193A of the Criminal Procedure Code, which permits concurrent civil and criminal proceedings, and Article 247 of the Constitution. The Court noted that the police complaint by a third party, Edward Wanje Ziro, was made over five years after the underlying transaction, and that the DCI's letter of 4th December 2019 sought court documents concerning the very matters in issue in the suit. Applying the Court of Appeal's decision in Commissioner of Police & DCI vs Kenya Commercial Bank, the Judge held that while the Court's hands are not tied by Section 193A, it may intervene where investigations are oppressive, vexatious or aimed at aiding one party to steal a match. The application was granted in terms of Prayer No. 3, stopping the investigations, with costs in the cause.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Court can stop criminal investigations that are oppressive, vexatious or an abuse of process despite Section 193A of the Criminal Procedure Code

Holding

Yes - the Court exercised its power to stop the investigations into the title deed, holding them to be a roundabout way of having the civil suit determined in another forum.

Reasoning

The Court accepted that Section 193A allows civil and criminal proceedings to run concurrently, but relied on the Court of Appeal decision in Commissioner of Police & DCI vs Kenya Commercial Bank to hold that courts retain inherent power to interfere with investigations that are oppressive, vexatious, made in bad faith or intended to achieve ulterior motives. The timing of the complaint, over five years after the 2014 transaction and shortly after the Plaintiff closed its case, showed the investigation concerned the very same matters in issue in the suit.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • Although Section 193A of the Criminal Procedure Code permits concurrent civil and criminal proceedings, the Court's hands are not tied where criminal proceedings are shown to be oppressive, vexatious or aimed at aiding one party to steal a match against the other.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application dated 2nd November 2019 granted in terms of Prayer No. 3, stopping investigations by DCI Malindi or any other investigative arm of the executive into the property or title Kilifi/Chembe Kibabamshe/356
  2. 2.Costs of the application in the cause

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Criminal Procedure CodeSection 193A
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 247
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 157(11)
  • Penal CodeSection 350(1)

Cases cited (4)

  • Commissioner of Police & the Director of Criminal Investigations Department & Another vs Kenya Commercial Bank Ltd & 4 Others
    (2013) eKLR
  • Githunguri vs Republic
    (1985) LLR 3090
  • Ndarua vs R
    (2002) 1EA 2005
  • Kuwa vs Attorney General
    (2002) 2KLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Inherent power of the Court to prevent abuse of its process, exercised in a pending civil suit under the Environment and Land Court Act and Article 157(11) of the Constitution as discussed

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Azzuri Limited v George Kadenge Ziro & 5 others [2020] KEELC 3664 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). ELC Case No. 217 of 2014. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2020/3664/eng@2020-02-06

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.