Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedNot stated in judgment· [2020] KEELC 3511 (KLR)

Austin Omonyo Barasa v James Irungu Mwangi [2020] KEELC 3511 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
21 February 2020
2,359 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~9 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan land seller who withheld the signed transfer document had to complete the sale anyway, because the buyer wasn't the one in breach.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Plaintiff sued for specific performance of a sale agreement dated 18th December 2014 over L.R. No. 12715/11601 (also referred to as 12715/1601) in Mavoko, purchased from the Defendant for Kshs. 1,750,000, with a Kshs. 1,000,000 deposit and the balance payable upon successful lodging of the Transfer documents. The Defendant filed a Defence and Counter-claim seeking 10% of the purchase price, general damages and a mandatory injunction for release of his title, contending that their joint advocate, Tim Okwaro Associates, was to prepare the Transfer but declined, and that he validly terminated the Agreement by notice dated 5th August 2015 and rescission letter of 8th September 2015. The court framed as the first issue who bore the obligation to draft and engross the Transfer instrument. Relying on Clause 8 of the Agreement, which limited the joint advocate's instructions to preparing, witnessing and arbitrating on the Agreement, the court held that the firm was not obliged to draft the Transfer, and that under special condition 1 the Defendant himself was required to furnish a duly executed Transfer. Having released all other completion documents, the Defendant had no valid reason to withhold it. The Defendant, being in breach, could not invoke the Clause 5 completion/rescission mechanism, and his conduct suggested an intention to obtain a higher price. The court found the Plaintiff had proved his case on a balance of probabilities, allowed the claim for specific performance, dismissed the Counter-claim, and ordered the Defendant to pay the Plaintiff's costs. Judgment was delivered in Machakos on 21st February 2020 by O.A. Angote, Judge.

Key legal issues

#
01

Obligation to draft and engross the Transfer instrument

Holding

The joint advocate's role was limited by Clause 8 to preparing, witnessing and arbitrating on the Agreement; the obligation to draft and execute the Transfer fell on the Defendant through his own appointed advocate

Reasoning

Clause 8 confined Tim Okwaro Associates to preparing, witnessing and arbitrating on the Agreement. Special condition 1 required the Defendant to submit a duly executed Transfer. The Defendant never instructed Martin Keffa Simiyu Advocate to release an executed Transfer, never requested Tim Okwaro Associates to draft one, and adduced no evidence of paying fees for drafting. Had the joint advocate not been so limited, he would ordinarily have drafted both the Agreement and the Transfer.

p. 3
02

Entitlement to rescind under Clause 5

Holding

Only a party not in breach may serve a completion notice and rescind; the Defendant, being in breach, could not validly terminate

Reasoning

Clause 5 entitled a party not in breach to serve notice and rescind. The court found the Defendant breached the Agreement by failing to release the duly executed Transfer within the 90-day completion period. Having released all other completion documents, he had no valid reason to withhold the executed Transfer. The termination notice of 5th August 2015 and rescission letter of 8th September 2015 were therefore of no effect, and the Defendant's apparent motive was to obtain a higher price.

p. 3
03

Plaintiff's readiness and willingness

Holding

The Plaintiff was ready and willing to pay the balance upon lodging of the Transfer as agreed, and had paid more than the 10% deposit

Reasoning

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Where a sale agreement limits the joint advocate's instructions to preparing, witnessing and arbitrating on the agreement, the advocate is not obliged to draft the Transfer instrument; the vendor must furnish the duly executed Transfer as a completion document
  • A party in breach of a sale agreement cannot invoke a completion/rescission notice clause against the other party

Court orders

#
  1. 1.An order of specific performance commanding the Defendant to complete the Sale Agreement of 18th December, 2014
  2. 2.The Defendant to pay the costs of the suit
  3. 3.The Defendant's Counter-claim is dismissed with costs
Jurisdiction invoked
Original civil suit; no constitutional/statutory basis expressly invoked in the judgment

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Austin Omonyo Barasa v James Irungu Mwangi [2020] KEELC 3511 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2020/3511/eng@2020-02-21

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.