Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedKitale ELC Suit (No. not stated in judgment)· [2020] KEELC 3369 (KLR)

Selly Jepchumba Samoei & 3 others v Kimwei Arap Samoei [2020] KEELC 3369 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
27 February 2020
9,716 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~39 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court ruled family land bought with pooled money belongs to the whole family, even if the title sits in one person's name.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This first-instance Environment and Land Court decision at Kitale concerned a family dispute over title No. Kitale Municipality Block 15/Koitogos/246 registered in the defendant's sole name. The plaintiffs, brothers of the defendant and sons of the late Kipsongok Arap Chepkulei, claimed their father sold 5 acres of family land at Lessos and entrusted the proceeds to the defendant to purchase the Kitale land, which the defendant therefore held in trust for the family. The 1st plaintiff having died during the suit, his widow sought burial of his remains on the land, which the defendant opposed, claiming absolute ownership and counterclaiming for eviction and a permanent injunction. The court framed four issues: limitation, trust, burial and costs. On limitation it held that Section 7 of the Limitation of Actions Act does not apply to claims to determine trusts. On the trust, it found the plaintiffs' evidence consistent that the family land at Lessos was sold to fund the purchase; the defendant failed to account for his purchase funds and was contradicted by his own witness on the extensive family occupation of the land. Applying the Supreme Court's Kiebia decision and resulting-trust principles, the court declared a resulting trust. It allowed the burial of Joseph Kisorio Samoei on the land. Declining the prayer for direct subdivision among the plaintiffs because parties are bound by pleadings describing the land as family land, the court cancelled the defendant's title and directed registration in the name of the estate of the late Kipsongok arap Chepkulei pending distribution at the appropriate forum, with the defendant bearing the costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the suit is time barred under Section 7 of the Limitation of Actions Act

Holding

Limitation does not bar a suit to determine a trust; the claim is not one for mere recovery of land and limitation does not apply to trusts, including customary trusts

Reasoning

The court held the suit was not for recovery of possession but for declaration and determination of a trust, with the 1st plaintiff's family in occupation. Relying on Macharia Kihari and Stephens v Stephens, it found limitation does not apply to customary-law trusts or to beneficiary actions to recover trust property, so Section 7 could not defeat the claim.

p. 6
02

Whether the defendant holds the suit land in trust for the Chepkulei family

Holding

Yes - a resulting trust was established on the evidence that the patriarch's land at Lessos was sold and the proceeds used to buy the suit land

Reasoning

The plaintiffs' witnesses consistently testified the family land at Lessos was sold and the proceeds entrusted to the defendant and Shadrack Kemboi to buy the Kitale land. The defendant failed to account tangibly for his purchase funds, and his denial that family members lived on the land was contradicted by his own witness DW2. Widespread family residence on the land was persuasive of a belief it was family land, supporting a resulting trust.

p. 8
03

Whether Joseph Kisorio Samoei should be interred on the suit land

Holding

Yes, as he was entitled to a share of the land and lived there until death; burial would not prejudice the defendant

Reasoning

Having found the land held in trust and Joseph entitled to a share, and that he resided there until his death, the court held interment on the suit land would not prejudice the defendant and allowed the family to bury him there.

p. 9
04

Whether distribution should exclude the defendant

Holding

The court declined to order direct subdivision among the plaintiffs, holding parties to their pleading that the land is family land, and directed registration in the estate's name pending distribution

Reasoning

Prayer (b) implied exclusion of the defendant, but the plaint generally averred the land was family land. The court held parties bound by pleadings and instead directed that the title be cancelled and the land registered in the name of the estate of the late Kipsongok arap Chepkulei pending distribution at the appropriate forum.

p. 9

Legal principles established

#
  • Limitation under Section 7 of the Limitation of Actions Act does not defeat a claim to determine a trust over registered land
  • Trust must be proved by cogent evidence but registration in a trustee's sole name does not extinguish the trust
  • Where purchase monies are provided by one person and title taken in another's name, a resulting trust is presumed

Court orders

#
  1. 1.A declaration that the defendant holds title No. Kitale Municipality Block 15/Koitogos/246 in trust for the plaintiffs and members of the family of the first wife of the late Kipsongok arap Chepkulei
  2. 2.Cancellation of title No. Kitale Municipality Block 15/Koitogos/246 registered in the defendant's name
  3. 3.Registration of all the land comprised in title No. Kitale Municipality Block 15/Koitogos/246 in the name of the Estate of the late Kipsongok arap Chepkulei
  4. 4.Liberty for the family of the late Joseph Kisorio Samoei to inter his remains at his home on the suit land
  5. 5.The defendant to bear the costs of the litigation

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Limitation of Actions ActSection 7
  • Limitation of Actions ActSection 20(2)
  • Limitation of Actions ActSection 20(1)(b)
  • Registered Land Act (Cap 300, repealed)Section 28

Cases cited (12)

  • Isack Minaga Kiebia -vs- Isaiah Theuri M'Lintari and Isack Mungai M'Lintari
    Supreme Court Petition No. 10 of 2015
  • Twalib Hastayan Twalib & Another -vs- Said Saggar Ahmed Al-Heidy & Others
    [2015] eKLR
  • James M'Ngaruthi M'Rintari & another -vs- Muguna M'Rintari
    [2017] eKLR
  • Macharia Kihari -vs- Ngigi Kihari
    Civil Appeal No. 170 of 1993
  • Stephens & 6 Others -vs- Stephens & Another
    Civil Appeal No. 18 of 1987
  • Susan Mumbi Waititu Vs Mukuru Ndata & 4 Others
    2007 eKLR
  • Vitalis Mbugua Wainaina Vs Daniel Ndure Wainaina
    2005 eKLR
  • Re Estate of James Muiruri Kamau
    2018 eKLR
  • George Mbiti Kiebia and another vs Isaiah Theuri M'lintari and another
    2014 eKLR
  • Isack M'Inanga Kiebia -vs- Isaaya Theuri M'Lintari & Another
    Supreme Court Petition No 15 of 2015
  • Yogendra Purshottam Patel -vs- Pascalle Mireille Bash (Nee Patel) and 2 Others
    2006 eKLR
  • Calverly -vs- Green
    56 ALR 483
Jurisdiction invoked
Original jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court under the Environment and Land Court Act (not expressly cited in the judgment)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Selly Jepchumba Samoei & 3 others v Kimwei Arap Samoei [2020] KEELC 3369 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). Kitale ELC Suit (No. not stated in judgment). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2020/3369/eng@2020-02-27

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.