Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedELCA Case No. 1 of 2018 (Formerly HCCA No. 60 of 2016)· [2020] KEELC 2932 (KLR)

Thomas Akinyi Apela v Lolwe Cooperative Society [2020] KEELC 2932 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
30 April 2020
2,198 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~9 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Environment and Land Court dismissed a plot owner's appeal because it was filed over a year late, past the 30-day legal deadline.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The appellant appealed to the Environment and Land Court at Kisumu against a judgment of the Chairman of the Cooperative Tribunal (M. T. Kariuki, dated 8 June 2015) in Cooperative Tribunal Case No. 36 of 2011. Before the Tribunal, the appellant, a member of the respondent society, claimed ownership of plots 494, 508, 509 and 510 in Lolwe, alleging they had been fraudulently re-allocated to third parties. He sought a declaration of ownership, alternatively compensation or allocation of separate plots, plus general damages for breach of fiduciary duty. The Tribunal dismissed his claim on plots 509 and 510, finding he had not filed Form C as required by the society's AGM resolution authenticating ownership after fraud and loss of records, and that he produced no sale agreement or share certificate for plot 510. On appeal, the court first found the appeal fatally incompetent: filed on 18 June 2016, over a year after the Tribunal's decision, it breached the 30-day limitation in Section 81 of the Co-operative Societies Act, with no extension sought. The court nonetheless addressed jurisdiction, holding that under Section 76 the Tribunal properly entertained the dispute since the appellant was a member. On the merits, the court upheld the Tribunal's findings on fraud, the binding AGM resolution, and the appellant's failure to prove lawful acquisition of plot 510. The appeal was dismissed with costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the appeal was filed within the statutory 30-day period

Holding

The appeal filed on 18/6/2016, more than one year after the Tribunal's decision of 8/6/2015, was out of time with no extension obtained

Reasoning

Section 81(1) of the Co-operative Societies Act allows an aggrieved party 30 days to appeal, with the court empowered to extend the period only upon sufficient reason. No extension was sought or granted, and the appeal was lodged more than a year late. The court noted this ground alone could determine the appeal instantly but proceeded to address the other issues raised.

p. 3
02

Whether the Tribunal had jurisdiction over the dispute

Holding

The Tribunal had jurisdiction because the appellant was a member of the society and the dispute concerned its business

Reasoning

Section 76 of the Co-operative Societies Act mandates referral to the Tribunal of disputes concerning the business of a co-operative society arising among members, past members and persons claiming through them, or between such members and the society. Since the appellant was a member, he had the right to claim before the Tribunal; the ground of lack of jurisdiction failed.

p. 3
03

Whether the appellant proved ownership of plots 509 and 510

Holding

The appellant did not prove ownership: he failed to file Form C as required by the AGM resolution for plot 509, and produced no sale agreement or share certificate for plot 510

Reasoning

For plot 509, the AGM of the society resolved that members file Form C to authenticate ownership following discovery of fraud and loss of records; the resolution bound the appellant and his non-compliance meant he failed to prove ownership, entitlement lying only in a refund. For plot 510, he neither produced a sale agreement nor a share certificate from Joash Obong'o Obong'o, so ownership could not be found. The Tribunal's findings were upheld.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • An appeal from the Cooperative Tribunal must be filed within thirty days of the order appealed against, and non-compliance renders the appeal fatally out of time.
  • Members, past members and persons claiming through them have a right to refer disputes concerning the business of a co-operative society to the Tribunal under Section 76.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The appeal is dismissed with costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Co-operative Societies ActSection 81(1), (2), (3)
  • Co-operative Societies ActSection 76(1), (2)
On appeal from
Cooperative Tribunal
Cooperative Tribunal Case No. 36 of 2011
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 81 of the Co-operative Societies Act (appeal from the Cooperative Tribunal to the High Court, sitting as the Environment and Land Court)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Thomas Akinyi Apela v Lolwe Cooperative Society [2020] KEELC 2932 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). ELCA Case No. 1 of 2018 (Formerly HCCA No. 60 of 2016). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2020/2932/eng@2020-04-30

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.