Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCStruck OutPetition No. 3 of 2019 (Isiolo)· [2020] KEELC 2931 (KLR)

Mwanganza L.P.O Self-Help Group v Attorney General & 3 others [2020] KEELC 2931 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
30 April 2020
2,413 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~10 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
Mwangaza L.P.O Self-Help Group, a registered self-help group representing persons displaced by the compulsory acquisition of land for the expansion of Isiolo Airstrip into Isiolo International Airport, petitioned the Attorney General, the National Land Commission, the Kenya Airports Authority and the Isiolo County Government seeking resettlement remedies, together with an application for conservatory orders. The National Land Commission raised a preliminary objection dated 10 May 2019 on the ground that the petitioner is not an entity capable under Kenyan law of instituting an action in its own name; the 1st and 3rd respondents and the interested parties in the related Petition 6 of 2011 supported the objection, while the petitioner relied on Articles 22, 258, 259 and 260 of the Constitution and urged the court to disregard procedural technicality under Article 159(2)(d). The court, following Kipsiwo Community Self Help Group and Kituo cha Sheria, held that although Article 260 defines a 'person' to include unincorporated bodies, such bodies have no legal capacity to sue or be sued in their own names and must sue through an entity with legal capacity or by a representative action by precisely named members. Noting that the group was registered only on 23 November 2018 while the displacement occurred in 2004 and 2005, and that conflicting member lists (260, 700 and 588 persons) without proof of authorization made substitution impossible, the court struck out the petition and ordered each party to bear its own costs of the preliminary objection.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether an unincorporated self-help group has capacity to institute a petition in its own name

Holding

It does not; despite Article 260 defining 'person' to include unincorporated bodies, such bodies lack legal capacity and must sue through an entity with capacity or as a representative suit by named members

Reasoning

Article 260's definition of 'person' allowing unincorporated bodies to claim under Articles 22 and 258 does not vest them with legal personality. Following Kipsiwo and Kituo cha Sheria, the court held that unincorporated entities cannot be litigants in their own standing. Registration of the group under the Ministry of social development does not confer capacity to sue or be sued.

p. 2
02

Whether the defect could be cured by amendment or substitution

Holding

No, because the persons intended to benefit from the petition cannot be precisely identified - conflicting lists of 260, 700 and 588 persons were produced without proof of authorization

Reasoning

The court considered whether the petition could stand if amended. The supporting affidavit spoke of nearly 300 members, the annexed list AJD 002 showed 260 unsigned names with no heading or nexus to the petitioner, and AJD 005 listed 700 and 588 displaced persons. Without precise identification and authorization, substitution is impossible, mirroring the dilemma in Kipsiwo.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • Self-help groups and other unincorporated entities have no legal personality and cannot institute proceedings in their own names; they must sue through an entity with legal capacity or by way of a representative action by named members
  • Locus standi is not a procedural technicality curable under Article 159(2)(d); it goes to the root of the matter

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The petition is struck out, having been filed by an entity not capable under the Laws of Kenya of instituting an action in its own name
  2. 2.Each party to bear their own costs of the preliminary objection

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 22
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 159(2)(d)
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 258
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 259(1)(b)
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 260
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 21 rule 1
  • Non-governmental Co-ordination Actsection 12(3)

Cases cited (4)

  • Kipsiwo Community Self Help Group v Attorney General and 6 others
    [2013] eKLR
  • Kituo cha Sheria v John Ndirangu Kariuki & another
    [2013] eKLR
  • Dennis Ololoigero & 2 Others v The Art of Ventures Ltd & 2 others
    [2006] eKLR
  • Mumo Matemu vs. Trusted Society of Human Rights Alliance & 5 Others
    (2014) eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Articles 22, 258 and 260 of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Mwanganza L.P.O Self-Help Group v Attorney General & 3 others [2020] KEELC 2931 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). Petition No. 3 of 2019 (Isiolo). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2020/2931/eng@2020-04-30

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.