Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedELC No 89 of 2017 (Formerly Nakuru 358 of 2013)· [2020] KEELC 2763 (KLR)

John Kimini Kamutu v Joseph Macharia Ngunjiri & 3 others [2020] KEELC 2763 (KLR)

Environment & Land Court
6 May 2020
4,252 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~17 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A man who openly farmed and lived on land for 35 years without a title deed was declared its rightful owner, defeating the registered owner and later buyers.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The plaintiff, a shareholder of Gatarakwa Farmers Company Ltd, balloted for 12 acres in December 1977, discharged the loan to the company, and from 1978 took possession, building a homestead, fencing, cultivating, keeping cattle and burying kin on the land, but never procured a title deed. In 2013 the 1st Defendant, registered proprietor of the parent parcel LR No. Nyandarua/Aberdare Forest North Block 1/822 since 16 June 1987, confronted the plaintiff, who placed a caution. The 1st Defendant nevertheless subdivided the land into parcels 2131-2135 and sold them to the 2nd, 3rd and 4th Defendants, with new titles issued in February 2014 while the suit was pending and the caution in place. The defendants and their counsel were duly served with a hearing notice but did not attend, and the court proceeded ex parte under Order 12 Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules. Applying Sections 7, 13, 37 and 38 of the Limitation of Actions Act and the principles in Maweu v Liu Ranching and Farming Cooperative Society, Benjamin Kamau Murma v Gladys Njeri and Chevron (K) Ltd v Harrison Charo Wa Shutu, the court found that limitation began to run on 16 June 1987 and lapsed 12 years later, in 1999. The plaintiff's possession was open, continuous, exclusive and nec vi, nec clam, nec precario, extinguishing the 1st Defendant's title, leaving him no title to pass to the purchasers. The Originating Summons succeeded; the resultant titles were cancelled, the plaintiff was declared owner by adverse possession and ordered registered, with costs to the plaintiff.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Plaintiff acquired title by adverse possession over the suit land

Holding

Yes; the Plaintiff balloted for the land, took possession in 1978 and openly occupied it for over 35 years, exceeding the 12-year limitation period

Reasoning

The court found the Plaintiff balloted for and settled on the 12 acres in 1978, fenced, built, cultivated, kept cattle and buried kin on the land. The 1st Defendant was registered on 16 June 1987, whereupon limitation began to run and lapsed on 16 June 1999. The Plaintiff's acts were nec vi, nec clam, nec precario and inconsistent with the registered owner's title, so the 1st Defendant's title was extinguished.

p. 5
02

Whether the 1st Defendant, whose title had been extinguished, could pass good title to the 2nd, 3rd and 4th Defendants by subdivision and sale

Holding

No; the 1st Defendant had no title to pass, so the subsequent titles over the resultant parcels are cancelled

Reasoning

By the time the 1st Defendant subdivided the suit land and sold portions to the 2nd, 3rd and 4th Defendants (new titles issued 17 February 2014, while the suit was pending and a caution was in place), his interest had already been extinguished by adverse possession, leaving no title to pass to the purchasers.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • To prove title by adverse possession, possession must be adequate, continuous, public and adverse to the registered owner
  • The title of a registered proprietor is extinguished in favour of an adverse possessor at the expiry of 12 years of adverse possession
  • An adverse possessor must prove possession as of right: nec vi, nec clam, nec precario

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Declaration that the Plaintiff has acquired title by adverse possession over LR No. Nyandarua/Aberdare Forest North Block 1/2130, 2131, 2132, 2133, 2134 and 2135, subdivisions of LR No. Nyandarua/Aberdare Forest North Block 1/822
  2. 2.Cancellation of the title deeds for LR No. Nyandarua/Aberdare Forest North Block 1/2130, 2131, 2132, 2133, 2134 and reversion to LR No. Nyandarua/Aberdare Forest North Block 1/822
  3. 3.Registration of LR No. Nyandarua/Aberdare Forest North Block 1/822 in the names of the Plaintiff, with the 1st Defendant to sign all necessary transfer instruments, and in default the Deputy Registrar of the court authorized to sign
  4. 4.Costs of the suit to the Plaintiff

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Limitation of Actions Act (Cap 22)Section 7
  • Limitation of Actions Act (Cap 22)Section 13
  • Limitation of Actions Act (Cap 22)Sections 9, 10, 11 and 12
  • Limitation of Actions Act (Cap 22)Section 37
  • Limitation of Actions Act (Cap 22)Section 38
  • Land Registration ActSection 28(b)
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 12 Rule 2
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 11

Cases cited (6)

  • Jane Wanjiru Kamau vs Benson Wamai
    [2008] eKLR
  • Gulam Miriam Noordian vs Charo Karisa
    [2015] eKLR
  • Maweu vs Liu Ranching and Farming Cooperative Society
    1985 KLR 430
  • Benjamin Kamau Murma & Others vs Gladys Njeri
    CA No. 213 of 1996
  • Chevron (K) Ltd v Harrison Charo Wa Shutu
    [2016] eKLR
  • Adnam v Earl of Sandwich
    (1877) 2QB 485
Jurisdiction invoked
Environment and Land Court jurisdiction under the Limitation of Actions Act (Cap 22), Sections 7, 13, 37 and 38 (adverse possession claim over registered land)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "John Kimini Kamutu v Joseph Macharia Ngunjiri & 3 others [2020] KEELC 2763 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). ELC No 89 of 2017 (Formerly Nakuru 358 of 2013). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2020/2763/eng@2020-05-06

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.