Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNET/179/2016 (Notice of Motion dated 28th May 2019)· [2020] KEELC 2534 (KLR)

Balcon Housing Company Limited & another v Elizabeth Njeri Hinga; National Emvironment Management Authority (NEMA) & 2 others (Intrested Parties) [2020] KEELC 2534 (KLR)

National Environment Tribunal
5 May 2020
1,385 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan tribunal dismissed a contempt claim against a landowner, ruling that unclear photos and third-party quarrying weren't enough to prove she disobeyed court orders.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling by the National Environment Tribunal determined a Notice of Motion dated 28th May 2019 in which Balcon Housing Company Limited and the Hinga Residents Association sought a finding that Elizabeth N. Hinga was in contempt of a stop order issued by the Tribunal on 24th June 2016 under section 129(4) of EMCA, and of preservation orders issued by Justice Mbogholi Msagha in ELC 157 of 2008, with committal to civil jail. The dispute concerns ownership and quarrying activities on LR No. 11478 Mirema Drive, a property of about 151 acres. The Respondent denied service of the stop order until January 2017, denied continuing quarrying, and attributed any ongoing activity to illegal quarrying by third parties from a nearby slum, which she had reported to Kasarani police. The Tribunal framed a single issue: whether the Respondent was guilty of contempt of the NET stop order. It held that the preservation orders in ELC 157 of 2008 fell outside this application, as the 1st Applicant had filed a separate contempt application over those orders. Applying the principle in Mwangi H.C Wangondu v Nairobi City Commission that contempt must be proved beyond a balance of probabilities, the Tribunal found the Applicants' evidence - unclear photocopies of photographs and no record of blasting - insufficient. The application was dismissed with costs to the Respondent.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Respondent wilfully disobeyed the NET stop order of 24th June 2016

Holding

No contempt established; Applicants failed to discharge the elevated burden of proof

Reasoning

The court noted contempt proceedings are quasi-criminal and a person cannot be punished unless deliberate disobedience is shown. The Respondent demonstrated she had already stopped quarrying after prior orders in ELC 445 of 2013 varied by consent. The Applicants' photographs were unclear photocopies showing stationary vehicles, with no evidence of blasting. Any ongoing illegal quarrying was attributed to third parties, and the Respondent had reported these activities to Kasarani police. She cannot be liable for the criminal acts of others.

p. 2
02

Whether the alleged disobedience of the preservation orders issued by Justice Mbogholi Msagha in ELC 157 of 2008 could be determined in this application

Holding

No; that issue belongs to a separate contempt application already filed by the 1st Applicant

Reasoning

The court observed that Balcon Housing Company Limited had filed a separate application for contempt arising from disobedience of the preservation orders in ELC 157 of 2008. The same issue could therefore not be raised in this application, which concerns only the NET stop order.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • The standard of proof in contempt proceedings is higher than in ordinary civil cases; contempt must be proved beyond a balance of probabilities leaving no doubt as to the contemnor's culpability

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Notice of Motion dated 28th May 2019 is dismissed with costs to the Respondent

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Environment Management and Coordination Act (EMCA)section 129(4)
  • Companies Act

Cases cited (1)

  • Mwangi H.C Wangondu - vs - Nairobi City Commission
    Nairobi Civil Appeal No. 95 of 1998
Jurisdiction invoked
Contempt jurisdiction of the National Environment Tribunal in respect of its stop order issued under section 129(4) of the Environment Management and Coordination Act (EMCA)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Balcon Housing Company Limited & another v Elizabeth Njeri Hinga; National Emvironment Management Authority (NEMA) & 2 others (Intrested Parties) [2020] KEELC 2534 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). NET/179/2016 (Notice of Motion dated 28th May 2019). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2020/2534/eng@2020-05-05

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.