Wikio Investment Company Limited v Purity Kimwati Ikayo & another [2020] KEELC 2492 (KLR)
The bottom line
#When a court has already entered judgment against you, ask the court to set it aside first—recalling witnesses comes later.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether the Defendants could recall the Plaintiff's witnesses where interlocutory judgment had been entered against them
The application was unmerited because interlocutory judgment had already been entered; the proper course was to apply to set aside that judgment first.
Interlocutory judgment was entered on 29 January 2015 and the suit proceeded to formal proof on 11 June 2018 in the Defendants' absence. The Defendants only filed a Statement of Defence on 10 December 2018 without leave. The court, citing Order 10 Rule 11, held the application to recall witnesses premature and advised setting aside the judgment first.
Legal principles established
#- Where interlocutory judgment has been entered, an application to recall witnesses is premature; the defendant must first apply to set aside the judgment under Order 10 Rule 11.
Court orders
#- 1.The Notice of Motion application dated 16th October 2019 is dismissed with costs
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Sections 1A, 1B and 3 of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 40(1)(a) of the Civil Procedure Rules
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Wikio Investment Company Limited v Purity Kimwati Ikayo & another [2020] KEELC 2492 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). . Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2020/2492/eng@2020-05-14
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.