Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedELC Case of 2018 (Murang'a)· [2020] KEELC 2258 (KLR)

Kenya National Chamber of Commerce & Industry - KNCC1 (Muranga Chapter) & 2 others v Delmonte Kenya Ltd & 3 others; County Government of Kiambu (Interested Party) (Environment and Land Case 86 of 2018) [2020] KEELC 2258 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
3 June 2020
5,577 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~22 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Environment and Land Court dismissed a 125-year-old land claim as too late, confirming that Kenya's 12-year limit on land claims applies even to historical injustices.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Plaintiffs, purporting to act for 2000 members whose ancestors were allegedly dispossessed of land by the colonial Government around 1895, sued for a declaration entitling them to 1500 acres out of suit lands (LR Nos 12157/2-5, 12158, 13169, 12203/1-2 and 13289), transfer of those acres to the 1st Plaintiff in trust, and a permanent injunction restraining renewal or extension of the 1st Defendant's leases until their historical interests were provided for. They also moved for consolidation with another ELC suit and a temporary injunction. The 1st Defendant filed a defence and a preliminary objection on three grounds: lack of jurisdiction over historical injustice claims dating to 1895, statutory time bar, and non-compliance with Order 4 Rule 1(2) and (4) of the Civil Procedure Rules. The 2nd to 4th Defendants did not respond. The court first struck out grounds of opposition filed by Kandara Residents Association, a stranger to the suit. It held that the ELC's jurisdiction over historical land injustices is not ousted by Article 67 of the Constitution or section 15 of the NLC Act, following Safepak and the Koech decision. However, the claim was irredeemably time barred under section 7 of the Limitations of Actions Act - even computing from 1968, time expired in 1980 - and the section 15 exemption applies only to the NLC, not the Court. The 1st Plaintiff, an unincorporated branch, lacked capacity to sue, and the verifying affidavits were not sworn by authorised officers. The preliminary objection succeeded; the motion and the entire suit were dismissed with costs to the 1st Defendant.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the suit, founded on a 1895 colonial land alienation, is time barred and whether the time bar ousts jurisdiction

Holding

The claim is time barred under section 7 of the Limitations of Actions Act; the exemption in section 15 of the NLC Act applies only to the NLC; the Court therefore lacks jurisdiction and must down its tools

Reasoning

The cause of action arose in 1895; even computing time from the commencement of the Limitations of Actions Act in 1968, the 12-year period expired in 1980. No fraud, mistake or ignorance was pleaded under section 26, nor leave sought under section 27. Section 15(3)(b)(ii) of the NLC Act permits statute-barred historical injustice claims to be addressed by the NLC, not the ELC. Lacking jurisdiction, the Court must down its tools.

p. 9
02

Whether the 1st Plaintiff, described as a branch of the Kenya National Chamber of Commerce & Industry, has capacity to sue under Order 4 Rule 1(2) and (4) of the Civil Procedure Rules

Holding

The suit offends Order 4 Rule 1(2) and (4): the 1st Plaintiff is not an incorporated body, no verifying affidavit was sworn by a duly authorised officer, and no representative authority was shown

Reasoning

A certificate of incorporation of the national Chamber was annexed but the 1st Plaintiff is only a branch; no evidence showed the branch's mandate to sue for the national entity or that the 2nd and 3rd Plaintiffs were members or authorised officials. An unincorporated body cannot sue in its own name, and the verifying affidavit requirements were not met.

03

Whether the ELC can entertain historical land injustice claims notwithstanding the NLC's mandate under Article 67 and section 15 of the NLC Act

Holding

Yes - the Court's jurisdiction over historical land injustice claims is not ousted; such a claim fits within a claim to title to land

Reasoning

Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution and section 13 of the ELC Act confer wide powers over land disputes. Following Safepak Limited v Henry Wambega and Chief Land Registrar v Nathan Tirop Koech, the Court held that a court may hear historical injustice claims whether or not the NLC is seized of the matter. However, this did not save the suit, which failed on limitation and capacity.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • The jurisdiction of the ELC to hear historical land injustice claims has not been ousted by Article 67 of the Constitution or the NLC Act
  • The limitation exemption under section 15 of the NLC Act applies to the NLC and not to the ELC
  • A claim to recover land must be brought within 12 years under section 7 of the Limitations of Actions Act, and no exemption was pleaded under sections 26 or 27
  • An unincorporated body has no legal capacity to sue in its own name and must sue through its registered officials or in a properly authorised representative suit

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The grounds of opposition and written submissions filed by Kandara Residents Association, a stranger to the suit, are struck out from the record
  2. 2.The Preliminary Objection dated 13/12/18 succeeds
  3. 3.The Notice of Motion dated 10/12/18 is dismissed
  4. 4.The suit is dismissed entirely
  5. 5.Costs payable by the Plaintiffs in favour of the 1st Defendant
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution read with section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenya National Chamber of Commerce & Industry - KNCC1 (Muranga Chapter) & 2 others v Delmonte Kenya Ltd & 3 others; County Government of Kiambu (Interested Party) (Environment and Land Case 86 of 2018) [2020] KEELC 2258 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). ELC Case of 2018 (Murang'a). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2020/2258/eng@2020-06-03

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.