Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedE.L.C. Case No. 347 of 2015· [2020] KEELC 2072 (KLR)

Humphrey Irungu Macharia v Ngari Kiringa & 2 others [2020] KEELC 2072 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
14 May 2020
4,686 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~19 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Environment and Land Court in Embu dismissed a landowner's challenge to a Minister's 1986 appeal decision, ruling his title was irregularly issued during the pending appeal.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Plaintiff, registered proprietor of Title No. Mbeere/Kirima/724, sued the 1st Defendant and State officers seeking declarations that the Minister for Lands' decision in Minister's Land Appeal Case No. 1775 of 1986 was null and void, that he was absolute owner of the parcel, and a permanent injunction restraining the burial of the deceased (the 1st Defendant's father) on the land. He claimed to have purchased the property from the deceased in 1980, but the Minister had awarded the deceased's family 4 acres of it. The Attorney General raised a preliminary objection that the suit against the 2nd, 3rd and 4th Defendants had abated for want of service; the court upheld it, finding no valid summons was served for about four years after filing. On the merits, the court held the Minister had jurisdiction under Section 29 of the Land Adjudication Act, delay did not oust it, allegations of bias were unproved, and the Plaintiff's title had been irregularly issued during the pendency of the appeal contrary to Section 28, which required a restriction. The court followed Euton Njuki Makungo and declined to follow Josphat Nyaga Mukembo. The suit was found not res judicata nor an abuse of process, but the Plaintiff failed to prove his case. The suit against the 2nd, 3rd and 4th Defendants was struck out, the suit against the 1st Defendant dismissed in its entirety, and costs awarded to the Defendants. Judgment was delivered on 14 May 2020 by Y.M. Angima, J.

Key legal issues

#
01

Competency of suit against the 2nd, 3rd & 4th Defendants for want of service of summons

Holding

The suit against them was incompetent and struck out; the preliminary objection on service was upheld.

Reasoning

The suit was filed on 9 November 2015 but served on the Attorney General only on 30 July 2019, about four years later. There was no record of when summons were extracted or collected, no affidavit of service before that date, and no application to extend the validity of summons under Order 5 Rule 2. Failure to collect and serve summons within thirty days causes the suit to abate.

p. 3
02

Whether the Minister's decision in Land Appeal Case No. 1775 of 1986 was null and void

Holding

Not null and void; the Minister had jurisdiction and the allegations of bias and irrelevant considerations were unproved.

Reasoning

The Minister's appellate power under Section 29 of the Land Adjudication Act is expressly conferred by statute and is final. No jurisdictional objection was raised before the Minister, delay does not oust jurisdiction where no time limit is prescribed, and the Plaintiff's title was irregularly issued during the pendency of the appeal since the Registrar was obliged to register a restriction under Section 28. All parties were heard; bias was not proved.

p. 5
03

Res judicata and abuse of court process

Holding

The suit was neither res judicata nor an abuse of process.

Reasoning

Although the subject matter of previous objection proceedings, the Minister's appeal and Embu CMCC No. 186 of 2015 was the same property, the matters in controversy in this declaratory suit were not conclusively determined in those proceedings. No evidence showed the Plaintiff was using court machinery for improper or ulterior purposes.

p. 5
04

Entitlement to reliefs

Holding

The Plaintiff, having failed to prove his case, was entitled to none of the reliefs sought.

Reasoning

The Plaintiff failed to prove the Minister's decision null and void, so he could not be declared absolute owner; the injunction was overtaken by events as the deceased had been buried years earlier upon conclusion of the appeal.

p. 6

Legal principles established

#
  • A suit against a defendant served with no or invalid summons abates; the consequence of failure to serve summons within the prescribed time under Order 5 is that no valid suit exists against that defendant.
  • A title issued during the pendency of an appeal to the Minister under the Land Adjudication Act, without the statutory restriction under Section 28, is issued irregularly.
  • Inordinate delay in hearing a Minister's appeal does not oust the Minister's jurisdiction where no time limit is prescribed under the Act and no objection was taken before the Minister.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Plaintiff's suit against the 2nd, 3rd & 4th Defendants be and is hereby struck out for being incompetent and bad in law for want of compliance with Order 5 Rules 1 & 2 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
  2. 2.The Plaintiff's suit against the 1st Defendant be and is hereby dismissed in its entirety.
  3. 3.The Defendants are hereby awarded costs of the suit to be borne by the Plaintiff.

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 5 Rules 1 & 2
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 15 Rule 2
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 7
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 27
  • Land Adjudication ActSection 29
  • Land Adjudication ActSection 28
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 40

Cases cited (9)

  • Nicholas Njeru Vs Attorney General & Others
    Nyeri Civil Appeal No. 110 of 2011 [2013] eKLR
  • Johana Buti V Walter Omariba & Others
    Kisumia Civil Appeal No. 182 of 2006 [2011] eKLR
  • Watuku Mutsiemi & Another V Republic & 5 Others
    [2018] eKLR
  • Josphat Nyaga Mukembo & 21 Others V Attorney General & 4 Others
    [2016] eKLR
  • Euton Njuki Makungo V Republic & 2 Others
    [2014] eKLR
  • R-v-Lancashire County Council Ex p Gayer
    (1980) 1 WLR 1024
  • Timotheo Makenge V Manunga Ngochi
    [1976-80] 1 KLR 1136
  • Trust Bank Limited V Amin & Co. Ltd
    [2000] KLR 168
  • Hussein Janmohamed & Sons V Twentsche Overseas Trading Co. Ltd
    [1967] EA 287
Jurisdiction invoked
Environment and Land Court jurisdiction over disputes relating to land (Article 162(2)(b) framework); suit by plaint under the Civil Procedure Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Later judgments citing this (3)

#

Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Humphrey Irungu Macharia v Ngari Kiringa & 2 others [2020] KEELC 2072 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). E.L.C. Case No. 347 of 2015. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2020/2072/eng@2020-05-14

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.