Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNotice of Motion dated 13th November 2019 (Originating Summons proceedings)· [2020] KEELC 1913 (KLR)

Joseph Mwangi Gatimu & 6 others v Joseph Karimi Maganjo & another [2020] KEELC 1913 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
5 June 2020
1,208 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court, not the Succession Court, decides who owns a deceased person's land, so this land dispute will proceed to full hearing.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The applicants/defendants filed a Notice of Motion dated 13th November 2019 seeking dismissal of the respondents'/plaintiffs' Originating Summons for disclosing no reasonable cause of action, contending that they are not registered proprietors of parcel MWERUA/MUKURE/1509 (registered in their father's name in 2005 pursuant to a High Court order), and that a parallel Succession Cause No. 378 of 2016, in which they are joint administrators, should determine whether the respondents have any claim to the land. The respondents opposed, stating they had sued the applicants as legal representatives of the registered proprietor, that they had been in adverse possession, and that the Succession Court had itself stayed the succession cause pending determination of this suit, its judgment to be presented to the succession court. The court applied the D.T. Dobie v Muchina principles as restated in Blue Shield Insurance, holding that striking out powers are discretionary and to be used sparingly where a pleading is clearly untenable. Relying on Priscilla Ndubi v Gerishon Gatobu Mbui, the court held that jurisdiction over ownership claims in a deceased's estate lies with the Environment and Land Court, not the Succession Court, which may only set aside a share to abide the ELC's determination. The applicants' contention that the succession cause could effectually determine the ownership issue therefore failed. The Notice of Motion was dismissed with costs on 5th June 2020 at Kerugoya, delivered by E.C. Cherono, ELC Judge.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Originating Summons should be struck out for disclosing no reasonable cause of action

Holding

The application was dismissed; the suit is properly before the ELC.

Reasoning

Relying on D.T. Dobie v Muchina principles as restated in Blue Shield Insurance, the court noted striking out is discretionary and sparingly exercised. Since ownership/adverse possession disputes fall within ELC jurisdiction, the suit was not untenable and the parallel succession cause was no bar.

p. 2
02

Whether Succession Cause No. 378 of 2016 can determine the adverse possession claim

Holding

No; the Succession Court lacks jurisdiction over ownership claims, so no abuse of process arises.

Reasoning

Following Priscilla Ndubi v Gerishon Gatobu Mbui, where questions of beneficial interest in a deceased's estate arise, the succession court may set aside the share to abide determination by the ELC under Order XXXVI rule 1. Thus the applicants' contention that ownership issues could be determined in the succession cause did not hold.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Jurisdiction to deal with claims of ownership in respect of the estates of a deceased person lies with the Environment and Land Court and not the Succession Court
  • The power to strike out a pleading which ends in driving a party from the judgment seat should be used sparingly and only where the pleading is clearly untenable

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Notice of Motion dated 13th November 2019 is dismissed with costs
  2. 2.Costs of the application awarded to the respondents/plaintiffs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Law of Succession ActSection 76
  • Law of Succession ActSection 82
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder XXXVI rule 1
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 6 Rule 13(1)(a)

Cases cited (3)

  • Blue Shield Insurance Company Ltd Vs Joseph Mboya Oguttu
    (2009) e K.L.R
  • D.T. Dobie and Company (Kenya) Ltd Vs Muchina
    (1982) K.L.R. 1
  • PRISCILLA NDUBI & ANOTHER VS GERISHON GATOBU MBUI
    MERU HCCC SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 720 OF 2013
Jurisdiction invoked
Original jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court over land ownership claims (interlocutory application in pending suit)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Joseph Mwangi Gatimu & 6 others v Joseph Karimi Maganjo & another [2020] KEELC 1913 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). Notice of Motion dated 13th November 2019 (Originating Summons proceedings). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2020/1913/eng@2020-06-15

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.