Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedELC Case No. 724 of 2017 (Formerly Nairobi ELC Case No. 1564 of 2014)· [2020] KEELC 1869 (KLR)

The Presbyterian Foundation v Bernard Ole Mereu & 4 others [2020] KEELC 1869 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
22 June 2020
5,095 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~20 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court cancelled a title acquired over public land hosting schools, a police post and a chief's office, ruling public interest outweighs private ownership.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Presbyterian Foundation, a company limited by guarantee, sued for a permanent injunction restraining trespass and interference with its title to Ngong/Ngong/66, alleging the 1st to 4th Defendants had trespassed and attempted to install a borehole. The 1st and 5th Defendants (Chief Land Registrar) filed a defence and counterclaim seeking a declaration that the land is public land, cancellation of the Plaintiff's title and re-registration in favour of the Permanent Secretary, Treasury in trust for the Government. The 2nd, 3rd and 4th Defendants were struck out by court order in 2015, though the judgment continues to refer to the 1st and 4th Defendants in places. The court found from the Green Card that the land was first registered in the name of Ol Kejuado County Council in 1964 with an entry reserving it for a school. The Plaintiff produced no Letter of Allotment or Deed Plan as required by the repealed Government Lands Act, and the Transfer Form was signed by the Commissioner of Lands rather than the registered County Council. At the time the title issued in December 1999, two public schools, a police post and the chief's office already operated on the land, facts the Plaintiff failed to disclose. The court held the title was acquired illegally, by mistake and unprocedurally, engaging the statutory exceptions to indefeasibility under sections 26(1)(b) and 80 of the Land Registration Act and section 143 of the repealed Registered Land Act. The Plaintiff's suit was dismissed; judgment was entered on the counterclaim declaring the land public, ordering rectification of the register and registration in favour of the Permanent Secretary, Treasury, with costs to the Defendants and a 90-day stay of execution.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Plaintiff validly acquired title to Ngong/Ngong/66

Holding

The title was obtained illegally, by mistake and unprocedurally; no Letter of Allotment or Deed Plan was produced and public utilities existed on the land at the time of registration

Reasoning

The Green Card showed the land was first registered in the name of Ol Kejuado County Council in 1964 with an easement noting reservation for a school. The repealed Government Lands Act required a Letter of Allotment and Deed Plan for alienation of public land, none of which was produced. The Transfer Form was signed by the Commissioner of Lands rather than the County Council. The Plaintiff also failed to disclose the existence of schools, a police post and chief's office on the land when obtaining title in 1999.

p. 4
02

Whether the Plaintiff was entitled to a permanent injunction and damages for trespass

Holding

No; the Plaintiff failed to discharge the burden of proving trespass and had no legally acquired title to protect

Reasoning

The Plaintiff's own witnesses admitted government institutions operated on the land and that teachers were posted by the Teachers Service Commission. The 1st Defendant was the local chief performing lawful duties. Since the title itself was found to have been illegally and unprocedurally acquired, there was no lawful possession capable of being disturbed by trespass.

p. 4
03

Whether the counterclaim for declaration of public land and cancellation of title should succeed

Holding

Yes; under sections 26(1)(b) and 80 of the Land Registration Act and section 143 of the repealed Registered Land Act, a title acquired illegally, unprocedurally or through misrepresentation may be cancelled and the register rectified

Reasoning

The court found the Defendants proved that the Certificate of Title was acquired illegally and unprocedurally. The statutory exceptions to indefeasibility in section 26(1)(b) of the Land Registration Act were engaged. Rectification under section 80 was therefore available, and the court declared the land public and ordered registration in favour of the Permanent Secretary, Treasury in trust for the public utilities.

Legal principles established

#
  • Acquisition of title is a process; indefeasibility cannot be claimed where the process was flawed, especially where public institutions occupy the land
  • Public interest in land supersedes private interest

Court orders

#
  1. 1.A declaration that land parcel number Ngong/Ngong/66 is public land
  2. 2.An order for rectification of the register of Ngong/Ngong/66 directing cancellation of the Plaintiff's name therefrom
  3. 3.The Land Registrar, Kajiado North directed to register the title to Ngong/Ngong/66 in the name of Permanent Secretary, Treasury to hold in trust for the Government of Kenya and issue a Certificate of Title to that effect
  4. 4.Costs of the suit including the Counterclaim awarded to the 1st and 4th Defendants
  5. 5.Stay of execution granted for 90 days

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of KenyaArticles 40, 62, 63, 64; former section 117
  • Registered Land Act (Cap 300, repealed)Sections 25(1), 27(a), 143(1), 28
  • Land Registration ActSections 25(1), 26, 26(1)(b), 27(2), 80(1), 80(2)
  • Government Lands Act (Cap 280, repealed)Part III; section 7

Cases cited (14)

  • Ratlal Gordhanbhai Patel vs. Lalji Makanji
    Civil Appeal No. 70 of 1956
  • The Registered Trustees of Arya Pratinidhi Vs National Land Commission
    (2016) eKLR
  • Isaac Gathungu Wanjohi & Another V Attorney General & 6 Others
    (2012) eKLR
  • Ambale vs. Masolia
    eKLR (1976)
  • Hannah Wangui Ithebu & Ndambuki Musembi and African Inland Church Kenya Registered Trustees vs. Catherine Nduku and 12 others
    (2017) eKLR; Civil Appeal No. 86 of 1999
  • Republic Vs Minister for Transport & Communication & 5 others Ex parte Waa Ship Garbage Collector & 15 Others
    (2006) 1 KLR (E&L) 563
  • Mureithi & 2 Others (For Mbari Ya Murathimi Clan) V Attorney General & 5 Others
    (2006) 1 KLR
  • Chemei Investments Limited Vs Attorney General & Others
    Nairobi Petition No. 94 of 2005
  • Denis Noel Mukhulo Ochwada & another v Elizabeth Murungari Njoroge & another
    [2018] eKLR; CA No. 298 of 2013
  • Joseph Arap Ngok Vs Justice Moijo ole Keiwua & 5 Others
    Civil Appeal No. Nai 60 of 1997
  • Kenya Anti-Corruption Commission vs. Online Enterprise Limited
    Kisumu ELC Number 708 of 2015
  • Republic vs Registrar of Lands in Kilifi ex parte Daniel Ricci
    Malindi HC JR No. 6 of 2013
  • Mako Abdi Dolal v Ali Duane & 2 others
    [2019] eKLR
  • Munyu Maina Vs Hiram Gathiha Maina
    Civil Appeal No. 239 of 2009
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution (Environment and Land Court) - not expressly stated in the judgment

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Later judgments citing this (1)

#

Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "The Presbyterian Foundation v Bernard Ole Mereu & 4 others [2020] KEELC 1869 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). ELC Case No. 724 of 2017 (Formerly Nairobi ELC Case No. 1564 of 2014). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2020/1869/eng@2020-06-22

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.