Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedELC No 29 of 2019 (OS) (formerly Nakuru 126 of 2003)· [2020] KEELC 1852 (KLR)

Joseph Mwangi Kangethe (substituted as the legal representative of Lucy Njeri Nganga (Deceased) [2020] KEELC 1852 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court of Kenya
25 June 2020
6,632 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~27 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court ruled that a title holder who holds family land in a customary trust cannot use the title deed to evict the family living on the land.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Environment and Land Court at Nyahururu, per M.C. Oundo J, allowed an amended Originating Summons in a long-running family land dispute over Title No. Nyandarua/Kiriita Mairo Inya Block 2 (Ngaindeithia) 653. The Plaintiff, substituted for his deceased mother who had settled on the land in 1970, claimed that his grandfather bought shares in Ngai Ndeithia Farmers Company Limited registered in the name of the Defendant's late husband, Mwangi Waithaka, and that the family occupied, developed and buried their kin on the land. The Defendant obtained registration in 2002/2003 without succession proceedings and issued vacation notices. She and her counsel failed to attend a hearing whose date they had taken by consent; the defence case was deemed closed and the matter proceeded ex parte. Framing four issues, the court held that a Kikuyu customary trust subsisted at first registration and bound the Defendant as registered proprietor, applying the Supreme Court's decision in Isaac M'inanga Kiebia and the overriding-interest provisions of the Registered Land Act (Section 30(g)) and Land Registration Act (Section 28). In the alternative, the court found adverse possession established: time ran from 1970, exceeding twelve years before suit was filed on 29 July 2003, and the Defendant's registration did not interrupt it (Githu v Ndeete). The court declared the Defendant a trustee of the Plaintiff and his immediate family, ordered cancellation of her registration and substitution of the Plaintiff's name in trust for the family, and awarded costs on a lower scale since the suit was undefended.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether a customary trust bound the Defendant as registered proprietor of the suit land

Holding

Yes. The court found that the land was family land held in trust by Mwangi Waithaka for the household of Waithaka Kahu, and that the Defendant's first registration did not extinguish the original Plaintiff's Kikuyu customary law rights.

Reasoning

The parties were of Kikuyu descent and the evidence showed the original Plaintiff's father bought the company shares while the family, not the deceased shareholder or the Defendant, occupied and developed the land from the 1970s and buried their kin there. Relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Isaac M'inanga Kiebia, the court held that a proved customary trust binds a registered proprietor as an overriding interest under Section 28 of the Land Registration Act.

p. 7
02

Whether the Plaintiff had acquired title by adverse possession

Holding

Yes. Time ran from 1970 when the family took possession, exceeding 12 years by the time suit was filed on 29 July 2003; the later registration of the Defendant did not interrupt the possession.

Reasoning

The court applied Sections 7, 13, 37 and 38 of the Limitation of Actions Act and the Maweu v Liu criteria of actual, open, exclusive and hostile possession. The court took judicial notice that land-buying company land was initially registered in the Government's name in trust for shareholders, so time ran against the Defendant from occupation. Possession continued for over 33 years before suit.

p. 6
03

Effect of the Defendant's failure to appear and file submissions

Holding

The matter proceeded ex parte under Order 12 Rule 2(a) of the Civil Procedure Rules and the Plaintiff's uncontroverted evidence and pleadings were accepted.

Reasoning

The Defendant and her counsel, though they had taken the hearing date by consent, did not attend; the defence case was deemed closed. The Defendant never amended her response to the amended Originating Summons nor filed submissions, leaving the Plaintiff's facts uncontroverted and unsupported by any evidence of how she acquired the land.

p. 7

Legal principles established

#
  • A customary trust subsisting at first registration is an overriding interest to which a registered proprietor is subject, and registration under the Registered Land Act does not extinguish such customary rights
  • Mere change of ownership of land occupied by a person in adverse possession does not stop time from running or interrupt the adverse possession
  • Rights of a person in possession or actual occupation of land are overriding interests under Section 30(g) of the Registered Land Act, now Section 28 of the Land Registration Act

Court orders

#
  1. 1.It is declared that the Defendant is registered as proprietor of Title No. Nyandarua/Kiriita Mairo Inya Block 2 (Ngaindeithia) 653 as a trustee of the Plaintiff and members of his immediate family who are the sole beneficiaries or dependents of the estate of Mwangi Waithaka (deceased)
  2. 2.There be cancellation of the Defendant's registration as proprietor of Title No. Nyandarua/Kiriita Mairo Inya Block 2 (Ngaindeithia) 653 and substitution thereof with the name of the Plaintiff in trust for himself and the members of his immediate family
  3. 3.Costs are granted on a lower scale since the suit was undefended

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Law of Succession ActCap 160
  • Limitation of Actions ActSections 7, 13, 17, 37, 38
  • Registered Land Act (repealed)Sections 27, 30(g)
  • Land Registration ActSections 25, 28(b)
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 27
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 12 Rule 2(a)

Cases cited (12)

  • Isaac M'inanga Kiebia vs Isaaya Theuri M'lintari & Another
    [2018] eKLR
  • Re Estate of Inzei Musindai (Deceased)
    [2019] eKLR
  • In Re Estate of Muraguri Murathu (Deceased)
    [2019] eKLR
  • Re Estate of job Ndunda Muthike (Deceased)
    [2018] eKLR
  • Maweu vs. Liu Ranching and Farming Cooperative Society
    1985 KLR 430
  • Benjamin Kamau Murma & Others vs Gladys Njeri
    C A No. 213 of 1996
  • Githu v Ndeete
    [1984] KLR 776
  • Obiero v. Opiyo
  • Esiroyo v. Esiroyo
  • Kiarie v. Kinuthia
  • James N. Kiarie v. Geoffrey Kinuthia & Another
    [2012] eKLR
  • Alan Kiama v Ndia Mathunya & Others
    CA 42/1978, unreported
Jurisdiction invoked
Original jurisdiction under the Environment and Land Court Act over a trust/adverse possession claim to land; suit originally filed in the Nakuru High Court as Civil Suit No 126 of 2003 and transferred to the ELC upon its establishment

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Joseph Mwangi Kangethe (substituted as the legal representative of Lucy Njeri Nganga (Deceased) [2020] KEELC 1852 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). ELC No 29 of 2019 (OS) (formerly Nakuru 126 of 2003). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2020/1852/eng@2020-06-25

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.