Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedNot stated in judgment· [2020] KEELC 1693 (KLR)

Paul Mbatia Jason Maina & another v Elizabeth Nduki Kivusyu & 3 others [2020] KEELC 1693 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
10 July 2020
1,640 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court cancelled a fraudulently obtained land title after finding the owners never signed or sold the property, awarding them costs.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Plaintiffs, Paul Mbatia Jason Maina and Mary Wanjiru Mbatia, sued four defendants seeking a declaration that the transfer of Kilifi/Kijipwa/494 to the 1st Defendant was obtained by fraud and be cancelled, and that they are the legal proprietors, plus costs and interest. They purchased the land in December 1995, were registered as proprietors, and fenced it. In January 2016 a neighbour alerted them to construction on the land; investigations by the DCI revealed the property had been transferred to the 1st Defendant on 25th September 2015 in a transaction facilitated at the offices of the 2nd Defendant Advocate, who purportedly witnessed their execution of the transfer forms. The 1st Defendant never entered appearance or filed a defence; the 3rd and 4th Defendants (the Attorney General and the Land Registrar) filed defences but did not participate at trial; the 2nd Defendant participated through counsel but called no evidence. The court found the Plaintiffs still held the original title deed, that the photographs on the transfer forms were not of them, that the consideration stated in figures (Kshs 300,000) contradicted the words (Kshs 2,500,000), and that the 1st Defendant, once aware of investigations, stopped development and sought a refund from the Advocates. Holding that the Plaintiffs had proved fraud on a balance of probabilities against the Defendants jointly and/or severally, the court entered judgment for the Plaintiffs as prayed, with costs to the Plaintiffs. Judgment delivered at Malindi on 10th July 2020 by J.O. Olola, Judge.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Plaintiffs proved fraud in the transfer of the suit property to the 1st Defendant

Holding

The court found that the Plaintiffs never sold the land; the transfer forms were executed without their participation, with irregular figures (Kshs 300,000 in figures against Kshs 2,500,000 in words) and false identification, establishing fraud on a balance of probabilities.

Reasoning

The Plaintiffs still held the original title deed; the photographs on the transfer form were not of them; the 2nd Defendant Advocate certified that they appeared before him when they had not; the 1st Defendant, once aware of DCI investigations, stopped construction and sought a refund from the Advocates. The 1st Defendant never entered appearance, and the 2nd Defendant called no evidence. On this uncontroverted material, the court found the transaction fraudulent and all Defendants jointly and/or severally liable.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • A party to whose benefit a fraudulent transfer of land accrued and who stays away from proceedings may be taken to have acquiesced in the fraud; a plaintiff who proves non-involvement in the impugned transfer on a balance of probabilities is entitled to cancellation of the fraudulent title.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Judgment entered for the Plaintiffs as prayed in the Plaint, including a declaration that the transfer to the 1st Defendant was obtained by fraud and be cancelled, and that the Plaintiffs are the legal proprietors of Kilifi/Kijipwa/494
  2. 2.Plaintiffs awarded the costs of the suit
Jurisdiction invoked
Original civil jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court over disputes relating to title to land (not expressly stated in the judgment)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Paul Mbatia Jason Maina & another v Elizabeth Nduki Kivusyu & 3 others [2020] KEELC 1693 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). Not stated in judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2020/1693/eng@2020-07-10

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.