Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNot stated in the judgment beyond the pleadings· [2020] KEELC 1637 (KLR)

Harith Ali Abdulkadir v Daniel Haller [2020] KEELC 1637 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court of Kenya
24 July 2020
5,649 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~23 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court dismissed both a landlord's rent-eviction claim and a tenant's repair counterclaim because neither side had receipts, records, or followed the lease's notice rules.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Plaintiff, suing as donee of a power of attorney from his father Ali Abdulkadir Abdalla, claimed that the Defendant had breached Clauses 1(a)(vii)/(viii) and 1(c), (d) and (e) of a lease of Kilifi/Mtwapa/1074 dated 14th December 2005 for a 25-year crocodile farm, and sought a declaration of breach, damages, eviction, rent of Kshs 1,406,250/- for the term commencing February 2015, Valuer's fees of Kshs 34,145/-, interest and costs. The Defendant admitted the lease but contended that rent was paid through changing agents, that only Kshs 693,750/- (subsequently paid under a consent order) had been outstanding, and counterclaimed for Kshs 2,177,966.50/- allegedly spent repairing the perimeter wall plus a like sum for remaining repairs. The Court found the Plaintiff's rent claim unproven: the rent-collecting agent was not called as a witness and no collection records were produced, and the power of attorney executed on 23rd September 2013 could not have retrospective effect. There was no inventory of the property at the lease's commencement, the locus in quo visit showed key items were never on the premises, and no notice of defects was given as required by the lease. The claim for rent from February 2015 was also held incompetent since the suit filed in November 2013 sought termination of the lease. The Counterclaim failed for want of receipts and the contractual notice of destruction. Both the suit and the Counterclaim were dismissed, with costs of the suit awarded to the Defendant.

Key legal issues

#
01

Proof of rent arrears and the effect of the power of attorney

Holding

The Plaintiff failed to prove the claimed arrears of Kshs 1,012,500/-; only the admitted Kshs 693,750/- was payable, and that was paid under a consent order; the power of attorney could not authorize collection of rent predating it

Reasoning

The Plaintiff's father's agent received rent but was not called as a witness and no records of collections were produced. The Plaintiff conceded his power of attorney did not authorize collection of rent and was executed on 23rd September 2013. Handwritten acknowledgments signed by the Lessor showed payments received. The Court thus found the claim unsupported and limited the provable arrears to the Defendant's admitted and paid sum.

p. 5
02

Condition of the premises and liability for repairs

Holding

The Plaintiff failed to prove the Defendant had damaged the property; there was no inventory of the property at the commencement of the lease, key items were found never to have existed, and the lease exempted the Defendant for reasonable wear and tear

Reasoning

The Court visited the locus in quo and noted the absence of a windmill, generator and other items the Plaintiff claimed were damaged. Defence witnesses said these items were never on the premises, and the Court could not disbelieve them. The lease exempted reasonable wear and tear, and the Plaintiff never gave the written notice of defects required by Clause 1(f) before suing. Digging crocodile pools was permitted by the lease.

p. 6
03

Claim for future rent in a suit seeking termination and eviction

Holding

The Plaintiff could not demand rent for the term February 2015 to February 2020 in a suit filed in November 2013 seeking termination of the lease and eviction

Reasoning

The sum of Kshs 1,406,250/- claimed was for the five-year term commencing 2nd February 2015, which was not due when the suit was instituted. The Plaintiff had elected to seek determination of the lease and eviction; if granted, the lease would have been terminated before that term ran. The demand was therefore inconsistent with the relief sought.

p. 6
04

The Defendant's Counterclaim for repair costs

Holding

The Counterclaim failed for want of proof of expenditure and want of the contractual notice of destruction or damage

Reasoning

The Defendant relied on a Quantity Surveyor's Bill of Quantities recommending demolition and reconstruction of the entire boundary wall at Kshs 4,353,933.40, but the report contained no breakdown of prices or evidence of what the Defendant had expended. Although the Court saw that some repairs had been done, no receipts were produced. The Defendant also failed to give notice to the Lessor as required under the lease to retain rent for destruction or damage.

p. 7

Legal principles established

#
  • A power of attorney executed on a particular date cannot have retrospective effect to authorize collection of rent due before its execution
  • A party claiming rent arrears must prove them; where only a sum admitted by the Defendant is proved, the Court can only accept that sum as due
  • A party who fails to follow contractual provisions for inspection and written notice of defects cannot complain of the state of repair
  • Claims for expenditure on repairs must be supported by receipts or documentary proof

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Plaintiff's suit is dismissed
  2. 2.The Defendant's Counterclaim is dismissed
  3. 3.The Defendant shall have the costs of the Plaintiff's suit
Jurisdiction invoked
Original civil jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court over a lease dispute relating to land parcel Kilifi/Mtwapa/1074 (specific constitutional/statutory provision not stated in the judgment)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Harith Ali Abdulkadir v Daniel Haller [2020] KEELC 1637 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). Not stated in the judgment beyond the pleadings. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2020/1637/eng@2020-07-24

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.