Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedE.L.C. Case No. 43 of 2018 (O.S.)· [2020] KEELC 1561 (KLR)

Juliana Kairu Gatumo v Philip Githongo Wainaina [2020] KEELC 1561 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
30 July 2020
1,049 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court handed a woman full ownership of land she openly occupied and farmed for over 12 years, even though someone else held the title.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Plaintiff filed an originating summons dated 1st November 2018 under Section 38 of the Limitation of Actions Act and Order 37 Rule 7 of the Civil Procedure Rules, seeking registration as proprietor of land parcel No. Nthawa/Riandu/881 by adverse possession, extinguishment of the Defendant's title, issuance of a title deed, and dispensation with production of the original title documents. She contended she had been in open, exclusive and uninterrupted possession since 1980, building dwelling houses and cultivating crops, with the Defendant's knowledge and without any eviction attempt. The Defendant, served by substituted service through the Standard Newspaper on 18th April 2019, did not enter appearance, and the suit proceeded undefended on 2nd July 2020. The court condensed the issues into whether the Plaintiff proved adverse possession and who should bear costs. Applying the test in Kasuve v Mwaani Investments Ltd, requiring exclusive, open and uninterrupted possession for 12 years, the court accepted the unchallenged evidence of possession exceeding the statutory period and development of the land. On costs, although the general rule is that costs follow the event under Section 27 of the Civil Procedure Act, the court held there should be no order as to costs given the undefended nature of the claim. The court allowed the originating summons in full, extinguishing the Defendant's title, ordering registration of the Plaintiff by adverse possession, issuance of a title deed, and dispensing with production of the original title documents.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Plaintiff established adverse possession of the suit property

Holding

Yes. Unchallenged evidence of open, exclusive and continuous possession since 1980, with development of the land, satisfied all the elements of adverse possession.

Reasoning

The court applied the test in Kasuve v Mwaani Investments Ltd, requiring exclusive, open and uninterrupted possession for 12 years. The Defendant, served by substituted service, did not enter appearance, so the Plaintiff's evidence was unchallenged. The court accepted that the Plaintiff had possessed and developed the land by constructing dwelling houses and planting perennial crops since 1980, far exceeding the statutory 12-year period, and held her claim proved.

p. 2
02

Costs of the suit

Holding

Despite the general rule that costs follow the event under Section 27 of the Civil Procedure Act, the court made no order as to costs because the claim was undefended.

Reasoning

The court acknowledged its discretion and the general rule that a successful litigant should ordinarily be awarded costs. However, because the Respondent did not defend the Applicant's claim for adverse possession, the court exercised its discretion to direct that there be no order as to costs.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • To be entitled to land by adverse possession, the claimant must prove exclusive, open possession as of right without interruption for 12 years, and title by adverse possession can be acquired for part of the land

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Defendant's title to land parcel No. Nthawa/Riandu/881 occupied by the Plaintiff and her family is extinguished
  2. 2.Land parcel No. Nthawa/Riandu/881 be registered in the name of the Plaintiff, Juliana Kairu Gatumo, by way of adverse possession
  3. 3.The Plaintiff be issued with a title deed to land parcel No. Nthawa/Riandu/881
  4. 4.Production of the original title deed, Land Control Board consents and transfer form over land parcel No. Nthawa/Riandu/881 to the Land Registrar be dispensed with at the time of registration of the Plaintiff as proprietor by adverse possession
  5. 5.No order as to costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Limitation of Actions ActSection 38
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 37 Rule 7
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 27

Cases cited (2)

  • Kasuve Vs Mwaani Investments Ltd & 4 Others
    [2004] 1KLR 184
  • Wanja Vs Sakwa No. 2
    [1984] KLR 284
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 38 of the Limitation of Actions Act (Cap. 22) and Order 37 Rule 7 of the Civil Procedure Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Juliana Kairu Gatumo v Philip Githongo Wainaina [2020] KEELC 1561 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). E.L.C. Case No. 43 of 2018 (O.S.). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2020/1561/eng@2020-07-30

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.