Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedKisii Environment and Land Case (Appeal) - appeal from Kisii CMELC No. 16 "B" of 2018· [2020] KEELC 1155 (KLR)

Monicah Thomas & 5 others v Henry Nyakoe Kasora [2020] KEELC 1155 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
22 September 2020
3,676 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~15 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a first-instance appeal to the Environment and Land Court at Kisii (J.M Onyango J) against the judgment of the Chief Magistrate's Court at Kisii (Hon. E.A Obina P.M, delivered 12th December 2019), which dismissed the Defendants' counterclaim and entered judgment for the Respondent declaring the Defendants trespassers on land parcel WEST KITUTU/MWAKIBAGENDI/1680. The Respondent, administrator of his late father's estate, obtained registration in 2017 through succession proceedings after the parcel was transferred to his father in 1986 by way of sale during the lifetime of Tagare Ongao. The Appellants counterclaimed for declarations of ownership, fraud, cancellation of registration and trust, claiming ancestral family land. The appeal raised three issues: proof of trust, whether the counterclaim was rightly dismissed, and whether the appeal should be allowed. The court held that the Environment and Land Court, not the succession court, has jurisdiction over trust claims in land, customary trust being an overriding interest under section 28 of the Land Registration Act. However, the Appellants failed to demonstrate the creation of the trust or discharge the burden of proof, and failed to prove the pleaded fraud to the standard above a balance of probabilities. The Respondent derived title by transmission through a valid grant. The appeal was dismissed with costs to the Respondents, and the trial court's dismissal of the counterclaim was affirmed.

Key legal issues

#
01

Jurisdiction over trust claims in land

Holding

The Environment and Land Court, not the succession court, has jurisdiction to determine proprietary interests in land based on trust.

Reasoning

The court disagreed with the trial magistrate's view that trust claims belong in succession proceedings, associating itself with Musyoka J in Re Estate of Mbai Wainaina. It reasoned that customary trust is an overriding interest under section 28 of the Land Registration Act, which lists 'Trusts including customary trusts' among interests that bind registered land without being noted on the register.

p. 4
02

Proof of trust

Holding

The Appellants failed to prove that the Respondent's father held parcel 1680 in trust for his brothers; there was no demonstrated intention to create a trust.

Reasoning

Applying Re Estate of the late Jonathan Kinyua Waititu, trusts are implied only to give effect to the parties' intention. The brothers Thomas Ongaro and Agostino Morande were never registered and did not seek subdivision or dissolution; no explanation was given why they could not have been registered as joint owners. The burden under section 107 of the Evidence Act was not discharged.

p. 4
03

Proof of fraud

Holding

Fraud was not proved to the required standard; the Respondent obtained title by transmission through a lawful grant of letters of administration.

Reasoning

Relying on Gichinga Kibutha v Carolyne Nduku, the court held that fraud must be distinctly pleaded and proved above a balance of probabilities. The Respondent was registered as administrator of his father's estate; the Appellants are not beneficiaries of that estate, the parcel was transferred to Bernard during Tagare Ongao's lifetime, and Tagare Ongao never complained of fraudulent transfer. The dismissal of the counterclaim was therefore unassailable.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • The Environment and Land Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine matters relating to interests in land based on trust; such matters need not be litigated in succession proceedings.
  • Customary trust is an overriding interest under section 28 of the Land Registration Act.
  • A party alleging a trust must plead and sufficiently demonstrate how the trust was created; fraud must be distinctly pleaded and proved to a standard above a balance of probabilities.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The appeal is dismissed
  2. 2.Costs to the Respondents

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Land Registration Actsection 28
  • Evidence Actsection 107
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 2 Rule 10

Cases cited (12)

  • Julius Wachira Maina & 2 Others v Christopher Murathe Muraguri
    (2017) eKLR
  • In Re Estate of Mbai Wainaina - Deceased
    (2015) eKLR
  • Wilson Kaiga Gidion Gudahi (Suing as the legal representative of the estate of the Late Gideon Gudahi Kahiga) v Daniel Livoi Gideon
  • Isack M'Inanga Kieba v Isaaya Theuri M'Lintari & Another
    (2018) eKLR
  • Kiarie v. Kinuthia
  • Paul Kirinya v Delfina Kathiri
    (2019) eKLR
  • Re Estate of the late Jonathan Kinyua Waititu
    (2017) eKLR
  • Gichinga Kibutha v Carolyne Nduku
    (2018) eKLR
  • Wallingford v Mutual Society
    (1880) 5 App Case 685
  • Garden Neptune v Occident
    (1989) 1 Lloyd's Rep 305
  • Lawrence v Lord Norrey
    (1880) 15 App. Cas 210
  • Davy v Garret
    (1878) 7 Ch D. 473
On appeal from
Chief Magistrate's Court at Kisii
Kisii CMELC No. 16 "B" of 2018
Jurisdiction invoked
Environment and Land Court jurisdiction under Article 162(2) (Constitution) and the Environment and Land Court Act; jurisdiction to determine trusts in land

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Monicah Thomas & 5 others v Henry Nyakoe Kasora [2020] KEELC 1155 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). Kisii Environment and Land Case (Appeal) - appeal from Kisii CMELC No. 16 "B" of 2018. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2020/1155/eng@2020-09-22

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.