Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedJudicial Review Motion dated 27/2/2018 (amended 25/9/2019)· [2020] KEELC 1087 (KLR)

Placid View Properties Limited v National Land Commission & another; Kenya National Highways Authority & another (Interested Parties) [2020] KEELC 1087 (KLR)

High Court of Kenya
6 October 2020
4,849 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~19 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The High Court quashed the National Land Commission's revocation of Placid View Properties' land title because the company was never given notice or a fair hearing.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
Placid View Properties Limited, the registered proprietor of LR No 209/12367, Nairobi (on which the Ole Sereni Hotel stands), obtained leave and filed a judicial review motion seeking certiorari to quash Item Number 14 of Table 16 – Southern Bypass in Gazette Notice No 6865 published by the National Land Commission on 17/7/2017, which revoked the applicant's title under Article 68(c)(v) of the Constitution and Section 14 of the National Land Commission Act. The applicant contended it was never invited to or heard at any review hearing on the complaints by the Kenya National Highways Authority and Design Limited, contrary to Article 47, the Fair Administrative Action Act, Section 14(3) of the NLC Act and the 2017 Review Regulations. The Commission asserted the applicant participated in hearings of 16/2/2016, 23/2/2016 and 29/7/2016. The 2nd respondent and interested parties urged dismissal, invoking public interest and the applicant's due hearing. Justice B M Eboso framed two issues: compliance with natural justice and the appropriateness of certiorari. He found the Commission's claims about the 2016 hearings untruthful, since those proceedings related to an encroachment complaint by Indian Spray Painters Limited; the only invitation was for a hearing on 18/4/2017 which never took place, and no notice was given for the 27/3/2017 hearing. The Commission therefore breached natural justice. Certiorari issued quashing the impugned Gazette Notice, without resolving the substantive title dispute, and each party bore its own costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the National Land Commission complied with fair administrative action requirements in revoking the applicant's title

Holding

The Commission failed to give the applicant notice of or a hearing at the review hearings, contrary to Article 47, the Fair Administrative Action Act, Section 14(3) of the NLC Act and the 2017 Regulations.

Reasoning

The impugned decision stated hearings were held on 27/3/2017 and the Gazette Notice indicated hearings from 30/1/2017 to 3/2/2017, but there was no evidence the applicant was invited to either. The hearings of 16/2/2016, 23/2/2016 and 29/7/2016 related to a complaint by Indian Spray Painters Ltd, not to a Section 14 review. The only invitation was for a hearing on 18/4/2017, which did not take place. The notice of 17/3/2017 could not logically serve hearings held earlier.

p. 6
02

Whether certiorari is an appropriate remedy

Holding

Certiorari was appropriate because without it the investor would lose its investment without a hearing; however, certiorari does not resolve the substantive title dispute.

Reasoning

The impugned decision affected a developed parcel housing a hotel, and leaving it to stand would result in loss of investment without a hearing, contrary to Kenya's socio-economic philosophy. The Section 14 framework was enacted to ensure due process before revocation of title. But quashing the Gazette Notice does not settle ownership; the interested party may still ventilate its claim through available legal mechanisms.

p. 6

Legal principles established

#
  • A public body revoking a land title must observe the rules of natural justice and give the affected party notice and a hearing before doing so
  • Article 47 of the Constitution entrenches the right to fair administrative action and subjects administrative actions of state organs to the principle of constitutionality

Court orders

#
  1. 1.An order of certiorari quashing Item Number 14 of Table 16 – Southern Bypass, contained in Gazette Notice No 6865, S/No 14, published on 17th July 2017, relating to Land Reference Number 209/12367, Nairobi
  2. 2.Parties shall bear their respective costs of this suit

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 47; Article 67; Article 68(c)(v); Article 10
  • National Land Commission ActSection 14(1), 14(3), 14(c)
  • National Land Commission (Review of Grants and Dispositions of Public Land) Regulations, 2017Regulations 8, 28(5), 29(1), 29(2)
  • Fair Administrative Action Act
  • Land Registration Act, 2012Section 26(1)
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 53 (implied by judicial review motion)

Cases cited (3)

  • Communications Commission of Kenya & 5 Others v Royal Media Services Limited & 5 others
    (2014) eKLR
  • Judicial Service Commission v Mbalu Mutava & Another
    [2015] eKLR
  • Livingston Kunini v Minister for Lands & 4 others
    (2014) eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Judicial review jurisdiction under Order 53 of the Civil Procedure Rules and Article 47 of the Constitution (fair administrative action), by leave granted on 9/2/2018

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Placid View Properties Limited v National Land Commission & another; Kenya National Highways Authority & another (Interested Parties) [2020] KEELC 1087 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). Judicial Review Motion dated 27/2/2018 (amended 25/9/2019). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2020/1087/eng@2020-10-06

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.