Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedELC Case No. 20 of 2019· [2020] KEELC 907 (KLR)

Paul Ngashema Kamau v Amina Ali [2020] KEELC 907 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
21 October 2020
1,586 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kajiado court ordered a land occupier to vacate within 90 days but refused compensation because the owner couldn't prove his damages claim.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Plaintiff sued for eviction, a permanent injunction and mesne profits in respect of land parcel LR No. Kajiado/Kaputiei Central/5454, alleging that the Defendant had encroached on the land without permission, cultivated it, felled trees to burn charcoal and erected temporary structures. The Defendant was served on 12th March 2019 but neither entered appearance nor filed a defence, and the suit proceeded as an undefended hearing on 22nd July 2020 at which the Plaintiff testified as the sole witness and produced his Certificate of Title and a demand letter. The court framed four issues: entitlement to vacant possession, permanent restraint against interference, mesne profits, and costs. On possession, relying on sections 24(a) and 26(1) of the Land Registration Act and associated case law, the court held that the Plaintiff, as registered proprietor with an unchallenged Certificate of Title, is the absolute and indefeasible owner and entitled to vacant possession. On interference, the court found the Defendant a trespasser and, applying Giella v Cassman Brown, held that a prima facie case had been established warranting permanent restraint. However, on mesne profits, the court declined relief because the Plaintiff failed to discharge his burden of proof: he gave no evidence of when the Defendant entered the land or the extent of her encroachment of the 19.16-hectare parcel. Judgment was entered for the Plaintiff on a balance of probability: the Defendant was ordered to give vacant possession within 90 days, failing which an eviction order would issue, and costs were awarded to the Plaintiff.

Key legal issues

#
01

Entitlement to vacant possession

Holding

The Plaintiff, as registered absolute proprietor holding an unchallenged Certificate of Title, is entitled to vacant possession of the suit land

Reasoning

The Plaintiff produced a Certificate of Title proving registration as proprietor. Section 26(1) of the Land Registration Act makes the certificate prima facie evidence of absolute and indefeasible ownership, and section 24(a) vests absolute ownership in the registered proprietor. The Defendant did not enter appearance or file a defence, so the title was unchallenged and the Plaintiff is entitled to the protection of sections 24, 25 and 26 of the Act.

p. 2
02

Permanent restraint against interference

Holding

The Defendant is a trespasser and should be permanently restrained from interfering with the suit land, applying Giella v Cassman Brown principles

Reasoning

The Plaintiff claimed the Defendant encroached, cultivated the land, felled trees for charcoal and erected temporary structures. These averments were uncontroverted as the Defendant did not appear or defend. Applying the Giella v Cassman Brown principles, the Plaintiff established a prima facie case, and the Defendant, being a trespasser, should be permanently restrained from interfering with the land.

p. 2
03

Mesne profits

Holding

Mesne profits refused because the Plaintiff failed to discharge his burden of proof

Reasoning

Although the claim was uncontroverted, mesne profits must be proved. The Plaintiff gave no details of when the Defendant entered the suit land or the extent of her encroachment, and did not clarify whether she occupied the whole 19.16-hectare parcel. Relying on Peter Mwangi Mbuthia v Samow Edin Osman, a claimant must place material before the court demonstrating how the amount claimed was computed. The claim therefore failed.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • A Certificate of Title is prima facie evidence that the person named as proprietor is the absolute and indefeasible owner, challengeable only on grounds of fraud, misrepresentation, or illegal/unprocedural/corrupt acquisition (section 26(1) Land Registration Act)
  • Registration of a person as proprietor of land vests in that person the absolute ownership of that land together with all rights and privileges appurtenant thereto (section 24(a) Land Registration Act)
  • Mesne profits must be proved; a claimant must place material before the court demonstrating how the amount claimed was arrived at

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Defendant be and is hereby directed to give vacant possession of LR. No. KAJIADO/ KAPUTIEI CENTRAL/ 5454 to the Plaintiff within 90 days from the date hereon, failure of which an eviction order will issue
  2. 2.The Costs of the suit is awarded to the Plaintiff

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Land Registration Actsection 26(1)
  • Land Registration Actsection 24(a)
  • Civil Procedure Actsection 2 (definition of mesne profits)
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 21 Rule 13

Cases cited (5)

  • WILLY KIPSONGOK MOROGO v ALBERT K. MOROGO
    (2017) eKLR
  • Margaret Njeri Wachira V Eliud Waweru Njenga
    (2018) eKLR
  • Vincent Koskei V Bernard Koskei
    (2018) eKLR
  • Giella Vs. Cassman Brown & Co. Ltd
    (1973) EA 358
  • Peter Mwangi Mbuthia & another v Samow Edin Osman
    [2014] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Environment and Land Court jurisdiction under the Environment and Land Court Act over land parcels (suit land LR No. Kajiado/Kaputiei Central/5454)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Paul Ngashema Kamau v Amina Ali [2020] KEELC 907 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). ELC Case No. 20 of 2019. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2020/907/eng@2020-10-21

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.