Raphael Gachoki Njanguru v Benedict Karagu Ndanju & another [2020] KEELC 801 (KLR)
The bottom line
#The Environment and Land Court in Kerugoya refused to stop dealings with two disputed land parcels because the applicant failed to prove a strong case.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether temporary injunction should issue over registered land INOI/KIAGA/1243 and 1244
Application dismissed on all three Giella limbs
The court applied the Giella v Cassman Brown principles. It found the applicant, who was acting in person, had not demonstrated a prima facie case with probability of success, nor irreparable injury not compensable by damages, and that the balance of convenience tilted against granting the interlocutory orders. The respondents raised weighty preliminary objections including res judicata, citing prior dismissals in ELC Misc. 20/2014 and CMCC 181/2015, which the court noted on the face of the record without determining conclusively.
Legal principles established
#- The Giella test requires a prima facie case with probability of success, irreparable injury not compensable by damages, and, if in doubt, balance of convenience
Court orders
#- 1.The Notice of Motion dated 16th December 2019 is dismissed with costs in the cause
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Article 162(2) Constitution / Environment and Land Court Act (inherent jurisdiction of ELC; application brought under Order 40 Rule 1 CPR and Sections 1A, 1B and 3A CPA)
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Raphael Gachoki Njanguru v Benedict Karagu Ndanju & another [2020] KEELC 801 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). ELC Case (Kerugoya) - Notice of Motion dated 16th December 2019. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2020/801/eng@2020-10-09
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.