Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissed· [2020] KEELC 621 (KLR)

Petiro Ongwacho Ongwacho t/a Bluu Nile International Hotel v Kenya Commercial Bank Limited [2020] KEELC 621 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
5 November 2020
3,503 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~14 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kisii court let a bank proceed with auctioning a borrower's charged hotel because he couldn't prove a strong case, defective valuation, or missing statutory notices.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The applicant, a hotel developer, moved the court by Notice of Motion dated 2nd December 2019 seeking a temporary injunction to restrain the respondent bank from selling by public auction L.R No. Wanjare/Bogiakumu/4318, charged to secure a Kshs. 50,000,000 loan. He argued that the bank breached its statutory duty under sections 97(1) and (2) of the Land Act by relying on a defective forced sale valuation that ignored improvements to the hotel and devalued the developments without explanation, and that the sale was unlawful for want of a statutory notice under section 90 of the Land Act. Citing Minolta Limited and Orion East Africa Ltd, counsel urged that a fresh valuation be directed. The respondent, through the affidavit of Caroline Kajuju, Senior Credit Recovery Manager, showed the applicant was in prolonged arrears despite a July 2018 restructuring; that two statutory notices dated 2.4.2019 and 14.8.2019 were served by registered mail; and that the Damon Appraisers valuation of 9th August 2019 placed market value at Kshs. 110,000,000 with a forced sale value of Kshs. 82,500,000. Relying on Giella v Cassman Brown and Mrao v First American Bank, the court held that although the valuation had unexplained anomalies, the forced sale value was not below the 25% threshold in section 97(3), that statutory notices were served and unrebutted, and that damages would adequately compensate the applicant since the bank was a stable financial institution. The application was dismissed with costs in the cause on 5th November 2020.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether reliance on the Damon Appraisers valuation breached section 97(1) and (2) of the Land Act

Holding

No breach established; the forced sale value of Kshs. 82,500,000 was not below 25% of the market value even assuming the plaintiff's higher valuation

Reasoning

The court reviewed four valuation reports. Although the Damon Appraisers report did not account for improvements between 2014 and 2019 and devalued the hotel without explanation, section 97(3) only raises a rebuttable presumption of breach where the price is 25% or more below market value. Even adopting the plaintiff's Cambrian valuation of Kshs. 150,000,000, the forced sale value did not breach the statutory threshold.

p. 4
02

Whether the defendant failed to serve a statutory notice under section 90 of the Land Act

Holding

No; the bank served two statutory notices dated 2.4.2019 and 14.8.2019, with registered mail receipts, and these averments were unchallenged

Reasoning

The Senior Credit Recovery Manager deponed that the bank issued the mandatory statutory notices under sections 90(1), (2), (3) and 96(2) and (3) of the Land Act and annexed copies with registered mail receipts and the auctioneer's Notification of Sale with certificate of service. The applicant did not rebut these averments in his supplementary affidavit.

p. 5
03

Whether the applicant met the conditions for a temporary injunction

Holding

The applicant failed to establish a prima facie case with a probability of success, and irreparable loss was not shown since damages would suffice

Reasoning

Applying Giella v Cassman Brown and Mrao v First American Bank, the court found no prima facie case. On irreparable injury, the applicant knew the charged property would be sold on default, his own valuers had valued it, and the bank deponed it was a stable financial institution capable of compensating him. Balance of convenience did not arise.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • A chargee who undertakes a valuation before sale complies with section 97 of the Land Act where the forced sale value is not below 25% of the market value
  • Principles for grant of a temporary injunction as set out in Giella v Cassman Brown

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Notice of Motion dated 2nd December 2019 is dismissed
  2. 2.The costs of the application shall be in the cause

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure Actsections 1A, 1B, 3, 3A and 63(e)
  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010Order 40 rule 1(a) and 2(1)
  • Constitution of KenyaArticles 40 and 159(2)
  • Land Act, 2012sections 90(1), (2), (3), 96(2), (3), 97(1)-(7) and 99
  • Auctioneer's ActNotification of sale provisions

Cases cited (7)

  • Minolta Limited v National Bank of Kenya Limited
    (2018) eKLR
  • Joshua Kamau Willie & Another v Unaitas SACCO Society Ltd & Another; Brick Holdings & Engineering Ltd (Interested Party)
    (2019) eKLR
  • Orion East Africa Ltd v Ecobank Ltd
    (2015) eKLR
  • Ben Gitonga Muiruri v Equity Bank Ltd
    (2019) eKLR
  • Patrick Kangethe v Co-operative Bank of Kenya Ltd
    (2017) eKLR
  • Giella v Cassman Brown & Co Ltd
    (1973) E.A 358
  • Mrao v First American Bank of Kenya Limited
    (2003) eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Sections 1A, 1B, 3, 3A and 63(e) of the Civil Procedure Act, Order 40 rules 1(a) and 2(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010; Articles 40 and 159(2) of the Constitution; sections 97(1) and 99 of the Land Act, 2012

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Later judgments citing this (1)

#

Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Petiro Ongwacho Ongwacho t/a Bluu Nile International Hotel v Kenya Commercial Bank Limited [2020] KEELC 621 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). . Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2020/621/eng@2020-11-05

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.