Scorpion Properties Limited v Director of Planning, Compliance & Enforcement Nairobi City County & another [2020] KEELC 548 (KLR)
The bottom line
#A property owner challenging a Nairobi County enforcement notice must first use the statutory appeal process before going to court, or the case fails.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Exhaustion of alternative remedies as a bar to judicial review
The applicant was required to first exhaust the appeal mechanism under section 38 of the Physical Planning Act (appeal to the Liaison Committee, then the National Liaison Committee, then the High Court) before seeking judicial review, and its failure to do so barred the application.
Section 9(2) of the Fair Administrative Action Act, 2015 made exhaustion of alternative remedies a statutory requirement in tandem with Article 159(2)(c). The court held it has no discretion in the matter save where exceptional circumstances justify exemption under section 9(4). The applicant gave no reason for not pursuing the statutory appeal, and its claim that the notice was invalid was a ground of appeal rather than a basis for judicial review.
Whether a judicial review court can determine ownership of disputed land
The court cannot determine the ownership dispute over the suit property in judicial review proceedings; the applicant should have raised the challenge to the Enforcement Notice in the pending civil suit, HCCC No. 2156 of 2007.
The applicant's ownership of the suit property was disputed, the property was listed in the Ndungu Report as illegally allocated public land, and a civil suit over ownership was pending. Determining these contested issues of fact would require viva voce evidence, which judicial review cannot accommodate. The pending civil suit was the better forum to resolve all issues surrounding ownership of the suit property.
Whether the applicant's right to fair administrative action was violated
No prima facie violation of the right to fair administrative action was established because the applicant had a right to be heard through the statutory appeal process, which it did not use.
Under section 38 of the Physical Planning Act, an Enforcement Notice does not take effect until the statutory appeal process is exhausted. The applicant was entitled to be heard by objecting to the notice and appealing, but did not make use of that mechanism. Accordingly, there was no prima facie evidence that the right to fair administrative action was violated.
Whether the applicant established a prima facie case warranting leave and stay
The applicant failed to establish a prima facie case against the respondents, and the discretionary leave was refused; the stay limb fell away.
The Enforcement Notice was provided for in law, and whether it had any basis could only be interrogated through the statutory appeal process. The court, exercising its discretion, declined leave; consequently it was unnecessary to consider whether leave should operate as a stay.
Legal principles established
#- Where a written law provides internal mechanisms for appeal or review or another remedy for an administrative action, the court is barred by section 9(2) of the Fair Administrative Action Act from entertaining judicial review unless those remedies have been exhausted
- The test for leave to apply for judicial review is whether there is an arguable case without examining the matter in depth
- A judicial review court cannot resolve a disputed question of ownership of land disguised as a judicial review application
Court orders
#- 1.The applicant's Chamber Summons application dated 15th August, 2018 is dismissed
- 2.Costs of the application awarded to the respondents
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Judicial review jurisdiction under Articles 22(3) and 47 of the Constitution and the Fair Administrative Action Act, 2015 (leave stage under the Law Reform Act regime)
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Scorpion Properties Limited v Director of Planning, Compliance & Enforcement Nairobi City County & another [2020] KEELC 548 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). Judicial Review Chamber Summons application dated 15th August, 2018. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2020/548/eng@2020-11-19
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.