Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedApplication dated 11th September 2020 (Eldoret ELC suit; plaint dated 26th May 2017)· [2020] KEELC 445 (KLR)

Lavatsa Kwamboya v Nicholas Gituhu Karira, Japheth Kipyego Chepkwony (Third Party); Moses Kibet Metto (Applicant) [2020] KEELC 445 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
11 November 2020
2,346 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~9 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

An Eldoret land court refused to let a man replace a deceased party in a case because his administration papers were for the wrong estate.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling of the Environment and Land Court at Eldoret (M. A. Odeny, J) determined an application dated 11th September 2020 seeking substitution of the deceased Third Party, Japheth Kipyego Chepkwony, with Moses Kibet Metto, together with leave to amend pleadings. The Third Party, enjoined by the Defendant's third party notice as the administrator of the estate of Paulo Kimeto Arap Sirma (the original leaseholder of the suit land, Eldoret Municipality Block 14/603), died on 30th April 2020. The applicant, who held letters of administration for the estate of Elizabeth Jepchoge Sirma, relied on Order 24 Rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules and authorities on substitution of deceased parties. The respondent opposed, arguing the applicant was not the legal representative of the correct estate, lacked locus standi, gave no formal application under Order 1 Rule 15, delayed inordinately, and made material non-disclosure, citing Brinks Mat Ltd v Elcombe. The court framed the sole issue as whether the applicant was the legal representative of the deceased Third Party. It found the applicant's letters of administration related to a different estate with no established connection to the estate of Paulo Kimeto Arap Sirma or the suit land, and held the applicant lacked locus standi. Applying the principle that suits for or against a deceased's estate may only be brought by or against an administrator, the court dismissed the application with costs to the respondent.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the applicant, an administrator of the estate of Elizabeth Jepchoge Sirma, could be substituted for the deceased Third Party who had been enjoined as administrator of the estate of Paulo Kimeto Arap Sirma

Holding

The application was dismissed because the applicant was not the legal representative of the deceased Third Party's estate and lacked locus standi

Reasoning

Order 24 Rule 4 requires substitution by the legal representative of the deceased defendant. The Third Party had been enjoined as administrator of the estate of Paulo Kimeto Arap Sirma, whose estate included the suit land. The applicant produced letters of administration for the estate of Elizabeth Jepchoge Sirma and did not establish any relationship between that estate and the estate of Paulo Kimeto Arap Sirma or the suit land. The relevant estate was not enjoined, so the applicant lacked capacity to bring the application.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • For an application for substitution of a deceased party to succeed, the applicant must be the legal representative of the deceased's estate; otherwise the applicant lacks locus standi
  • A suit for or against the estate of a deceased person can only be brought by or against an administrator of the estate

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application dated 11th September 2020 is dismissed with costs to the respondent

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010Order 24 Rule 4 (also referred to as Rule 3 and Rule 4(4) by counsel)
  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010Order 1 Rule 15
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 2 (definition of legal representative)

Cases cited (6)

  • Muriithi Ngenya vs Gikonyo Macharia Mwanqi & Another
    ELC No. 221 of 2017 (eKLR)
  • Mary Njoki Simon and Monicah Wanyonya
    (2019) eKLR
  • Isaac Waithaka vs Gicheha Nioroge & anor, Ann Nyaguthie Gicheha (proposed interested substitute of the Deceased)
    (2019) eKLR
  • Re Estate of Beth Muthei Mulili (deceased)
    (2019) eKLR
  • BRINKS - MAT Ltd vs ELCOMBE
    [1988] 3 All ER 188
  • Nephant Kiguta Kingori & 2 others v. Jane Gathoni Kingori & another
    (2015) eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Order 24 Rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Lavatsa Kwamboya v Nicholas Gituhu Karira, Japheth Kipyego Chepkwony (Third Party); Moses Kibet Metto (Applicant) [2020] KEELC 445 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). Application dated 11th September 2020 (Eldoret ELC suit; plaint dated 26th May 2017). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2020/445/eng@2020-11-11

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.