Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedELC Case No 712 of 2017 (Formerly Nairobi HCCC No. 822 of 2000 and Machakos ELC No. 215 of 2012)· [2020] KEELC 358 (KLR)

Simon Lengete Ole Mashua v Joseph Sampiroi & another [2020] KEELC 358 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
7 December 2020
2,399 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~10 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan landowner won an alternative plot from Kajiado County but lost his trespass claim because he had no beacon certificate or solid survey evidence.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Plaintiff, the allottee of Plot No. 17 Oloopon Loitoktok, sued the 1st Defendant, allottee of the neighbouring Plot No. 16, and the County Government of Kajiado, the allotting authority, seeking a declaration of ownership, general and special damages of Kshs. 40,000/=, a permanent injunction, and eviction and demolition orders against the 1st Defendant for alleged trespass. The 1st Defendant denied trespass, asserting he lawfully acquired and developed Plot No. 16. The 2nd Defendant, though served, filed no defence. The Plaintiff relied on a private surveyor's report alleging encroachment, while the 2nd Defendant's County Surveyor confirmed that Plot 16 did not encroach on Plot 17 and attributed the dispute to an error in the Part Development Plan, recommending an alternative site for Plot No. 17. The court held that the Plaintiff bore the burden of proving trespass and had failed, having produced no beacon certificate and relying on a surveyor who never personally took measurements. Ownership of Plot 17 was upheld, but the injunction, eviction, demolition and damages claims were refused for want of proof of trespass and of loss. The suit against the 1st Defendant was dismissed with costs. Against the 2nd Defendant, the court found an error in the PDP was established and directed the County Government to issue Letters of Allotment for the alternative site identified by its Surveyor George Sanini within 90 days, and to bear the costs of the suit for failing to resolve the dispute.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the 1st Defendant trespassed on the Plaintiff's plot No. 17

Holding

Trespass not proved; the evidence, including the 2nd Defendant's surveyor's report and approved building plans, showed no encroachment by plot 16 on plot 17

Reasoning

The court noted the parties' conflicting PDPs and the absence of a beacon certificate from the Plaintiff. The 2nd Defendant's County Surveyor confirmed plot 16 did not encroach on plot 17. PW2 admitted he never personally took measurements, undermining the credibility and independence of his report. The court also noted that the culvert construction and El Nino rains affected the plot's size. The Plaintiff should instead seek an alternative plot from the allotting authority.

02

Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to the orders sought in the Plaint

Holding

Claim against the 1st Defendant dismissed; claim against the 2nd Defendant allowed only to the extent of an order for allotment letters for an alternative site

Reasoning

Although the Plaintiff's ownership of plot No. 17 was undisputed and upheld, trespass not being proved, injunction, eviction, demolition and damages were refused. Evidence established an error in the PDP, and the 2nd Defendant's surveyor recommended an alternative site, which recommendation was uncontroverted. The court directed the 2nd Defendant to issue allotment letters for that alternative site within 90 days and to bear costs for failing to resolve the dispute.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • The plaintiff bears the burden of proving trespass, including furnishing measurements and a beacon certificate confirming the position of the plot

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Upheld the declaration that the Plaintiff owns plot No. 17 Oloopon Loitoktok
  2. 2.Dismissed the Plaintiff's case against the 1st Defendant with costs
  3. 3.Directed the 2nd Defendant to issue the Plaintiff with Letters of Allotment to the alternative site pointed out by their Surveyor George Sanini within 90 days from the date of the judgment
  4. 4.Directed the 2nd Defendant to bear the costs of the suit

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Trespass ActSection 3

Cases cited (6)

  • John Chumia Nganga V Attorney General & Anor
    ELC No 264 of 2014
  • Paul Audi Ochuodho V Josiah Ombura Orwa
    (2014) eKLR
  • Eliud Njoroge Gachiri V Stephen Kamau Nganga
    (2018) eKLR; ELC no. 121 of 2017
  • Judith Julia Wanjiro Njoroge V Samuel Ngeru Mwangi
    (2019) eKLR
  • Elizabeth Wambui Githinji & 29 Others V Kenya Urban Roads Authority & 4 others
    (2019) eKLR
  • Bhagwani Singh Kalsi V National Housing Corporation Eldoret
    ELC 15 of 2012
Jurisdiction invoked
Original civil jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court over land disputes (Environment and Land Court Act)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Simon Lengete Ole Mashua v Joseph Sampiroi & another [2020] KEELC 358 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2020). ELC Case No 712 of 2017 (Formerly Nairobi HCCC No. 822 of 2000 and Machakos ELC No. 215 of 2012). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2020/358/eng@2020-12-07

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.