Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissed· [2019] KEELC 4998 (KLR)

William Nzuki Munge v David Mutuku Sila & 2 others [2019] KEELC 4998 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
23 January 2019
850 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court dismissed a landowner's attempt to strike out a suit, confirming preliminary objections cannot rely on disputed facts.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The first Defendant filed a notice of preliminary objection dated 6th March 2018 raising three grounds: that the Plaintiff's suit was a non-starter; that the Plaintiff lacked locus standi; and that the suit offended the Law of Succession Act and Civil Procedure Act because the suit land was registered in the name of a deceased person, Mutuku Sila, with no grant of letters of administration or probate taken out. The court directed that the objection be disposed of by written submissions; only the Plaintiff complied. The Plaintiff's counsel, relying on Mukisa Biscuit Manufacturing Co. Ltd v West End Distributors Ltd, Oraro v Mbaja and Eglyne Chepchirchir Choge & 3 others v Singa Ham Edambo & 3 others, argued that the objection raised factual issues and that the Defendant, having entered appearance late and filed no proper defence, could not mount it. The court found the first Defendant was served on 7th February 2018; although he could enter appearance at any time, his statement of defence dated 20th March 2018 was filed without leave and was expunged from the record. With the defence expunged, the facts remained as pleaded by the Plaintiff, so the objection required factual inquiry and was not a true preliminary objection. The preliminary objection was dismissed with costs to the Plaintiff/Respondent.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the first Defendant's notice of preliminary objection raised a pure point of law

Holding

It did not; with the defence expunged, the facts remain as pleaded by the Plaintiff, so the objection involved factual inquiry and could not stand

Reasoning

Applying Mukisa Biscuit and Oraro v Mbaja, the court held that a preliminary objection must rest on law alone. The ground that the suit land is registered in the name of a deceased person without a grant required verification against facts and evidence. Having expunged the defence filed without leave, the court was left with the Plaintiff's pleaded facts, rendering the objection defective.

p. 2
02

Whether the defence filed without leave out of time should stand

Holding

The statement of defence was filed without leave and was expunged from the record

Reasoning

The first Defendant was served with summons on 7th February 2018 and ought to have entered appearance within 15 days and filed defence within a further 15 days. Though he could enter appearance at any time, the defence dated and filed 20th March 2018 was out of time and no leave was sought; it was therefore expunged.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A preliminary objection must raise a pure point of law on the assumption that all facts pleaded by the other side are correct; it cannot be raised where facts must be ascertained or discretion exercised
  • Any assertion claiming to be a preliminary objection but bearing factual aspects calling for proof is not a true preliminary objection
  • A defence filed out of time without leave of the court may be expunged from the record

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The first Defendant's statement of defence dated 20th March 2018 and filed without leave is expunged from the record
  2. 2.The notice of preliminary objection dated 6th March 2018 is dismissed with costs to the Plaintiff/Respondent

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Law of Succession ActNot specified
  • Civil Procedure ActNot specified
  • Rules made under the Civil Procedure ActNot specified

Cases cited (3)

  • Mukisa Biscuit Manufacturing Co. Ltd v West End Distributors Ltd
    [1969] EA 696
  • Oraro v Mbaja
    (2005) eKLR
  • Eglyne Chepchirchir Choge & 3 others v Singa Ham Edambo & 3 others
    [2018] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Original civil jurisdiction over the suit; ruling on a notice of preliminary objection under the Civil Procedure Act and Rules made thereunder

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "William Nzuki Munge v David Mutuku Sila & 2 others [2019] KEELC 4998 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). . Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2019/4998/eng@2019-01-23

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.