Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNotice of Motion dated 31/7/2017 (suit pending; Plaintiffs Monicah Nafula & Judith Nerima Ogombe v Leonard Shanya)· [2019] KEELC 4899 (KLR)

Kalori Barasa Otuba & 5 others v Monica Nafula Adui & another [2019] KEELC 4899 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
22 January 2019
1,332 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court refused to let six men join a land case as plaintiffs because their real dispute was with the plaintiffs, not the defendant.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Applicants, brothers of the Defendant Leonard Shanya, moved the court by Notice of Motion dated 31/7/2017 under Order 1 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules and Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act, seeking to be enjoined in a land suit as Plaintiffs and to obtain an injunction restraining the Plaintiffs/Respondents from enforcing a restraining order issued on 19/7/2017 over parcels SAMIA/BUDONGO/2577 and 2578. They claimed homes on the land, alleged unprocedural subdivision of their mother's parcel SAMIA/BUDONGO/99, and feared eviction. The Respondents opposed, distinguishing the suit parcels from parcels 2272-2278, denying the Applicants' occupation, and characterising the application as a back-door attempt to review the order of 19/7/2017 and assist the Defendant. The court agreed with the Respondents on Order 1 Rule 1: the Applicants failed to show a right or relief against the Defendant, who is their brother and not their adversary; their true grievance is against the Plaintiffs, so they cannot join the Plaintiffs' side. The court also held the prayer for a counter-injunction against the earlier order was anomalous and not based on any known law, the proper remedy being an application to stay or set aside that order, and that injunctive relief could not issue to persons who are not yet proper parties. The application was found incompetent and dismissed with costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Applicants could be joined as Plaintiffs

Holding

Joinder as Plaintiffs was not feasible; the Applicants oppose the Plaintiffs and should have sought a different capacity

Reasoning

The court held that joinder as Plaintiffs presupposes a common adversary. The Applicants' grievance is against the Plaintiffs, who obtained a restraining order affecting them, and the Defendant is their brother, not their adversary. Their application was therefore incompetent and muddled, and Order 1 Rule 1 requirements were not met.

p. 2
02

Whether a counter-injunction against the order of 19/7/2017 could issue

Holding

No; the proper remedy was to seek stay or setting aside of the order, not a counter-injunction

Reasoning

The court found the applicants sought an anomalous order to neutralise an earlier restraining order whose merits had not been successfully challenged. There is clear case law and statutory provision on stay or setting aside which the Applicants ignored.

Legal principles established

#
  • A party seeking joinder must demonstrate a right or relief against the party on whose side they seek to be placed, under Order 1 Rule 1
  • Injunctive relief cannot be granted to a person who is not yet a proper party to the suit

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application dated 31/7/2017 is dismissed with costs to the Respondents

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010Order 1 Rule 1
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 3A
Jurisdiction invoked
Order 1 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules and Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act (cap 21)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kalori Barasa Otuba & 5 others v Monica Nafula Adui & another [2019] KEELC 4899 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). Notice of Motion dated 31/7/2017 (suit pending; Plaintiffs Monicah Nafula & Judith Nerima Ogombe v Leonard Shanya). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2019/4899/eng@2019-01-22

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.