Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially Allowed· [2019] KEELC 4894 (KLR)

Stephen Kivandi Kamula v Boniface Kioko Mwololo [2019] KEELC 4894 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
17 January 2019
1,575 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is an interlocutory ruling of the Environment and Land Court at Makueni on a notice of motion dated 21st March 2018, brought by the Plaintiff/Applicant, Stephen Kivandi Kamula, under Order 40 Rules 1, 2 and 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010, seeking an injunction barring the Defendant from entering onto, transferring, alienating, disposing of, or collecting rent from the suit property Makueni/Emali Town/234 pending the hearing of the suit. The application was opposed by a replying affidavit and disposed of by written submissions. Both parties agreed that the Giella v Casman Brown principles governed. The Applicant, acting under a power of attorney from Bella Rose Lavi (the purchaser under a contested sale agreement), contended that the purchase price had been paid in full, that damages would be inadequate in a land matter, and invoked lis pendens. The Respondent argued the sale agreement was unenforceable for want of spousal consent and that the only remedy was a refund. The court held that the Applicant had locus standi under the power of attorney; that a prima facie case existed since the Respondent did not deny receiving the purchase price; that the Applicant might suffer irreparable injury; and that the balance of convenience favoured him. Applying lis pendens, the court enjoined the Respondent from transferring, alienating or disposing of the suit property pending determination of the suit, directed that rent collected be paid into an interest-earning account in the joint names of the parties' advocates, and awarded the Applicant the costs of the suit.

Key legal issues

#
01

Locus standi of the Applicant holding a power of attorney

Holding

The Applicant had locus standi to file the application and suit on behalf of Bella Rose Lavi

Reasoning

The court found as a fact that Bella Rose Lavi entered into the sale agreement and assigned a power of attorney to the Applicant to act on her behalf in every aspect, including court cases. The validity of the sale agreement is contested and reserved for the substantive hearing, but the power of attorney sufficed for the interlocutory application.

p. 2
02

Prima facie case with probability of success

Holding

A prima facie case was established; the Respondent did not deny receiving the purchase price

Reasoning

The court noted there is a contested property dispute with respective rights yet to be determined, but the Respondent did not deny receipt of the purchase price. That admission, coupled with the Applicant's compliance under the agreement, satisfied the first Giella principle at the interlocutory stage.

p. 2
03

Irreparable injury and balance of convenience

Holding

The Applicant might suffer irreparable injury and the balance of convenience tilts in his favour

Reasoning

Relying on the submission that this being a land matter no one parcel of land can be equated to another, the court accepted that the Applicant who expended his resources acquiring the property might suffer irreparable injury. On balance of convenience, the Applicant had performed his obligations while the Respondent neglected his, so convenience favoured the Applicant.

p. 2
04

Doctrine of lis pendens protecting the subject matter

Holding

The court invoked lis pendens to grant an injunction against transfer, alienation and disposal pending determination of the suit

Reasoning

The court accepted the Applicant's submission invoking lis pendens so that the court's decision would not be rendered a pure academic exercise and judicial resources would not be expended in vain, warranting protection of the suit property during the pendency of the litigation.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A purchaser who has paid the purchase price under a contested sale agreement and expended his resources may suffer irreparable injury if an injunction is not granted, since no one parcel of land can be equated to another
  • A holder of a power of attorney assigned to act on the principal's behalf in every aspect, including court cases, has locus standi to file an application and suit on the principal's behalf

Court orders

#
  1. 1.An order of injunction barring the Respondent from transferring, alienating and disposing the suit property Makueni/Emali town/234 pending the hearing and determination of the suit
  2. 2.That rent collected from the date of the order shall be paid into an interest earning account in the joint names of the advocates on record for the parties until further orders
  3. 3.The Applicant shall have the costs of the suit

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010Order 40 Rules 1, 2 and 3
  • Civil Procedure ActSections 1A, 1B and 3A
  • Land Law Amendment Act No. 28 of 2016Section 11(a) (amending Section 28(9) of the Land Registration Act)
  • Land Registration ActSection 28(9)

Cases cited (5)

  • Giella Vs. Casman Brown and Company Ltd
    (1973) EA 358
  • Kenleb Cons Ltd Vs New Gatitu Service Station Ltd & another
    {1990} KLR 557
  • J. M. Gichanga Vs Co-operative Bank of Kenya Ltd
    (2005) eKLR
  • Bernadate Wangare Muriu V National Social Security Fund Board of Trustees & 2 others
    (2012) eKLR
  • Naftali Ruthi Kinyua Vs Patrick Thuita Gachure & another
    (2015) eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Order 40 Rules 1, 2 and 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010; Sections 1A, 1B and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Stephen Kivandi Kamula v Boniface Kioko Mwololo [2019] KEELC 4894 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). . Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2019/4894/eng@2019-01-17

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.