Kangara Mutugi Kamau & 4 others v Nancy Wanjiku Maina & another [2019] KEELC 4808 (KLR)
The bottom line
#A Kenyan court ruled that you cannot secretly ask for permission to sue someone for disobeying a court order — the other side must be told and heard first.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Mode of hearing an application for leave to commence contempt proceedings
The ex-parte mode borrowed from English practice does not obtain in Kenya; in ongoing litigation the intended contemnor should be served and allowed to participate absent prejudice
Section 5(1) of the Judicature Act applies English contempt law, but by Section 11 of the Interpretation and General Provisions Act applied law must be read with modifications to fit local circumstances. Relying on the Goldenberg decision of the Court of Appeal, the court held that where leave is sought in ongoing litigation and no prejudice is shown, the ends of justice demand an inter-partes hearing.
Legal principles established
#- Applied English law under the Judicature Act must be read with formal modifications to fit Kenyan circumstances
- Leave applications for contempt in ongoing litigation should ordinarily be heard inter-partes where no prejudice is shown
Court orders
#- 1.This application for leave to commence contempt proceedings as against the Respondents be served for inter-partes hearing on 25th February 2019
- 2.The costs of the application to abide the event
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Section 5(1) of the Judicature Act (Cap 8) and Order 51 Rule 1 CPR
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Kangara Mutugi Kamau & 4 others v Nancy Wanjiku Maina & another [2019] KEELC 4808 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). Ex-parte Chamber Summons dated 19th November 2018. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2019/4808/eng@2019-01-25
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.