Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNot stated in the extract (ruling on Notice of Motion dated 9th November, 2017)· [2019] KEELC 4796 (KLR)

Sandalwood Lenana Limited v Chief Executive, Nairobi County & 3 others [2019] KEELC 4796 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
17 January 2019
1,312 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~5 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court cannot 'stay' a ruling that simply dismissed an application—the losing party must instead seek an injunction or other positive relief to pause action.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This Environment and Land Court ruling at Nairobi, delivered by S. Okong'o J on 17th January 2019, determined the plaintiff's Notice of Motion dated 9th November, 2017 seeking a stay of execution of the court's orders of 13th October, 2017 pending an intended appeal to the Court of Appeal. The underlying dispute concerned the plaintiff's suit against the 4th defendant's construction of a private sewer line along the frontage of the plaintiff's adjoining property, L.R No. 1/1161 on Lenana Road, Kilimani, Nairobi. By its ruling of 13th October, 2017 the court had dismissed the plaintiff's application for prohibitory and mandatory injunctions and declarations against the 4th defendant's sewer project and the 1st to 3rd defendants' approvals. The plaintiff contended that without a stay, the 4th defendant would proceed with construction and its business would be halted, and that its appeal had reasonable chances of success. The 4th defendant opposed, arguing that the orders of 13th October, 2017 merely dismissed the injunction application and were not capable of being stayed, and that the requirements of Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules were not met. The court agreed, holding that the orders of 13th October, 2017 were negative orders imposing no obligation on any party, applying Kanwal Sarjit Singh Dhiman v Keshavji Jivraj Shah and Raymond M. Omboga v Austine Pyan Maranga. The application was dismissed with costs to the 4th defendant.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether a negative order dismissing an injunction application can be stayed pending appeal

Holding

No; the orders of 13th October, 2017 dismissed the plaintiff's injunction application and did no more, and are incapable of being stayed.

Reasoning

The court traced the orders sought to be stayed to its earlier ruling which dismissed the plaintiff's application for injunction. Since dismissal of an application imposes no obligation on any party and confers nothing capable of execution, save costs, there is nothing before the court capable of a stay under Order 42 Rule 6. The court adopted the reasoning in Kanwal Sarjit Singh Dhiman v Keshavji Jivraj Shah and Raymond M. Omboga v Austine Pyan Maranga.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • An order that merely dismisses an application and requires no party to do or refrain from doing anything is a negative order incapable of execution and therefore incapable of being stayed.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The plaintiff's application for stay of execution dated 9th November, 2017 is dismissed
  2. 2.Costs of the application to the 4th defendant

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 42 Rule 6

Cases cited (2)

  • Kanwal Sarjit Singh Dhiman v Keshavji Jivraj Shah
    [20008] eKLR (as printed in the judgment)
  • Raymond M. Omboga v Austine Pyan Maranga
    Kisii HCCA No 15 of 2010
Jurisdiction invoked
Order 42 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules (invoked by the parties regarding stay pending appeal)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Sandalwood Lenana Limited v Chief Executive, Nairobi County & 3 others [2019] KEELC 4796 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). Not stated in the extract (ruling on Notice of Motion dated 9th November, 2017). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2019/4796/eng@2019-01-17

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.