Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedOriginating Summons dated 23rd January, 2017· [2019] KEELC 4792 (KLR)

Gladys Mary Kyulu v Mwendwa Wambua [2019] KEELC 4792 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
31 January 2019
688 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court gave ownership of land to someone who occupied it openly for over 12 years, even though the paperwork named someone else.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Plaintiff filed an Originating Summons dated 23rd January 2017 seeking a declaration that she was entitled to the parcel of land known as Kyangwithya/Nduumoni/149 by adverse possession, having occupied it since 2001, and an order that she be registered as absolute proprietor in place of the Respondent, the registered owner. The Respondent, who is the Plaintiff's uncle and allegedly sold her the land, was served but neither entered appearance nor filed a response; the summons proceeded to full hearing by viva voce evidence. The Plaintiff testified that she had lived on the land since 2001, and her advocate submitted that by the filing of the suit she had possessed it openly and continuously for sixteen years, with a homestead and cultivation, and that the Respondent was barred by Section 7 of the Limitation of Actions Act from recovering the land, his title having been extinguished. The court, applying Sections 7, 17 and 38 of the Limitation of Actions Act, found that the Respondent was registered as proprietor in November 1985 and that the Plaintiff's uncontroverted evidence showed open, continuous and uninterrupted occupation for at least twelve years, using the land nec vi, nec clam, nec precario. The court held the claim proved on a balance of probabilities and allowed the Originating Summons, declaring the Plaintiff entitled by adverse possession, directing the Land Registrar, Kitui, to register her as absolute proprietor, and ordering each party to bear their own costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Plaintiff proved adverse possession

Holding

Yes; the Plaintiff proved occupation openly, continuously and without interruption for at least twelve years, entitling her to registration as proprietor

Reasoning

The Respondent was registered as proprietor in 1985 but the Plaintiff took possession in 2001 after purchasing the land from him and remained in open, continuous and uninterrupted occupation for over twelve years, with a homestead and cultivation on the land. The evidence was uncontroverted as the Respondent neither entered appearance nor filed a response. The court found the possession was nec vi, nec clam, nec precario and proved the claim on a balance of probabilities.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • An action to recover land may not be brought after twelve years from the date the right of action accrued
  • Upon expiry of the limitation period, the title of the registered proprietor is extinguished and the adverse possessor may apply to the ELC for registration

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Applicant is declared entitled by adverse possession to all that parcel of land known as Kyangwithya/Nduumoni/149
  2. 2.The Land Registrar, Kitui, to register the Applicant as the absolute proprietor of parcel of land known as Kyangwithya/Nduumoni/149 in place of the Respondent
  3. 3.Each party to bear his/her own costs
Jurisdiction invoked
Sections 7, 17 and 38 of the Limitation of Actions Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Gladys Mary Kyulu v Mwendwa Wambua [2019] KEELC 4792 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2019). Originating Summons dated 23rd January, 2017. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2019/4792/eng@2019-01-31

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.